Trying to solve an equation but get weird solution with new variable

  • Context: Maple 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dscot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Variable Weird
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a mathematical equation using Maple and WolframAlpha, specifically focusing on the variable gamma(s) and its relationship to other variables. Participants are exploring issues related to variable assignment and unexpected results in their computations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to solve an equation in Maple but encounters a strange solution involving a new variable, _z.
  • Another participant points out that the initial equation shown does not contain the gamma variable, but rather sigmas, suggesting a possible mix-up in variable notation.
  • The original poster acknowledges the mix-up but indicates that their main problem persists and seeks further input.
  • A later post mentions attempts to use WolframAlpha for solving a related equation but encounters a computation time error, expressing frustration over the inability to generate the desired equation for sigma(s).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the source of the problem, as there are multiple interpretations of the equation and variable assignments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to solving the equation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of variable definitions and notation, as well as computational constraints encountered in WolframAlpha.

dscot
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to solve this equation inside of Maple:
http://screencast.com/t/EeqzLhxS for gamma(s)

I assign variables to each of the values like this:http://screencast.com/t/DBLS8BH6R

When I try to solve I get this weird answer with a new _z variable: http://screencast.com/t/qVHp7xVRFUq

Can anyone see what I've done wrong, I'm really going crazy with this one :)

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first screen capture with the formula contains no gammas that I can see. I see a couple of sigmas.
 
Sorry SteamKing, you are correct. I think I've mixed both the symbols up during my which I'll be sure to fix :)

My problem still holds true, would you have any thoughts on that?

Thanks =)
 
Sorry guys, still not had any luck with this.

I've also tried wolframAlpha with this: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+a=+((b^0.5+/+c^0.5)+*+exp(-d*(c-b)^2))+for+b

( I just separated the terms in order, into a,b,c,d)

But get this error: Standard computation time exceeded..

I got a similar error even with the 14 day pro trial.

I'm not sure what else to try all I'm trying to do is to generate an equation to work out sigma(s)?

Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K