Tube/Bar Rigidity: Which Offers Most?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SGT Steel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the rigidity of grade 316 stainless steel tubes versus solid bars for cantilevered applications involving loads of 10-12kg. It concludes that while solid rods provide greater rigidity than thick-walled tubes, the overall rigidity of a 4-foot long, 3/4-inch diameter cantilevered rod may still be insufficient. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering wall thickness in tubes and suggests using beam analysis calculators or CAD modeling tools to evaluate different cross-sectional profiles for optimal deflection performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cantilever beam mechanics
  • Familiarity with material properties of grade 316 stainless steel
  • Knowledge of beam analysis calculators and CAD modeling tools
  • Basic concepts of structural rigidity and deflection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research beam analysis calculators for cantilever beams
  • Explore CAD modeling techniques for structural analysis
  • Learn about the effects of wall thickness on tube rigidity
  • Investigate alternative cross-sectional profiles for improved deflection performance
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, structural designers, and anyone involved in selecting materials and designs for cantilevered structures requiring optimal rigidity and minimal deflection.

SGT Steel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Long time lurker, first time poster! Here is my query...

I need to send a load weighing 10-12kg down two horizontal, parallel, cantilevered, grade 316 stainless steel tubes -- or bars -- each between 3-4 feet in length, 3/4" in diameter, and spaced 85mm apart. What I'd like to know is; in this specific application, would tubes, or bars, offer the most rigidity? If tubes, would a thicker or thinner wall thickness offer the most rigidity?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A tube with a thicker wall is more rigid than a tube of the same outside diameter and material but with a thinner wall, but the solid rod of the same outside diameter and material is more rigid than the thick walled tube. However, I don't consider a 4 foot long 3/4 inch diameter cantilevered rod as being very rigid. Might want to consider a larger diameter depending on your
application.
 
How much deflection is allowable?
There are many beam analysis calculators on the web or in CAD modellers, or you can do the math yourself for the specific element's cross sectional profile. If you did this, perhaps you would find better solutions than tubular or solid circular cross sections that would solve your deflection issue. But would perhaps be more expensive or require more effort to mount.

It's all a series of trade offs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
11K