Undergrad Two-dimensional vector representation

Click For Summary
A method to represent a two-dimensional vector field with zero divergence and non-zero curl is discussed, specifically in the form of w = a ∇b. It is noted that if a is constant, the vector field becomes conservative and rotation-free, which contradicts the requirement for non-zero curl. The conversation highlights that a and b can be variable functions of x and y to allow for such representation. A negative example illustrates the contradiction of having a non-zero curl with a constant vector field, while a positive example suggests modifying the field outside a unit circle to achieve the desired properties. The discussion concludes that if a is treated as a vector, the representation aligns with concepts from magnetic fields and electric current density.
Gribouille
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is there a method to represent a known two-dimensional vector field w of two coordinates x and y with zero divergence and non-zero curl as
$$ \vec{w}(x,y) = a \nabla b \, , \hspace{4mm} \nabla \cdot \vec{w} = 0 \, , \hspace{4mm} \nabla \times \vec{w} = f(x,y) \, ?$$
How would one proceed to calculate a and b?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Gribouille said:
Hi,

Is there a method to represent a known two-dimensional vector field w of two coordinates x and y with zero divergence and non-zero curl as
$$ \vec{w}(x,y) = a \nabla b \, , \hspace{4mm} \nabla \cdot \vec{w} = 0 \, , \hspace{4mm} \nabla \times \vec{w} = f(x,y) \, ?$$
How would one proceed to calculate a and b?

No, I don't think so. Assuming a is constant, your vector field can be written as a gradient, which means it is conservative and therefore rotation-free, contradicting your assumption.
 
Thanks. a is not constant but depends on x and y, just as b.
 
Unless I made a mistake it is possible sometimes but not in general.

As negative example, consider ##\vec w = \vec c \times \vec r## where r is the position and c is a constant. Consider the unit circle. To get the direction right, ##\nabla b## has to be non-zero but going in a circle. It can't do that without having a rotation, contradiction.

As positive non-trivial example, use the w from above within the unit circle, then continue outside in a symmetric way with zero curl outside, and then add ##d=(10,0)## to it. Now our vector field doesn't have closed circles any more. We can introduce a suitable potential that gets the direction of the gradient right, and then fix the magnitude via a variable ##a##.
 
if a is a vector and w =a×∇b, then yes. w then is the magnetic field, a is a unit vector normal to x-y plane, b is the magnetic vector potential, and f(x,y) is the electric current density that creates the magnetic field.
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K