Two link planar robot elbow errors in textbook (Inverse kinematics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ineedhelpwithphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Robot
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on discrepancies in the definitions and illustrations of a two-link planar robot elbow in a textbook regarding inverse kinematics. Participants question which source is accurate and highlight the importance of consistent definitions for angles. There is a suggestion that errors may arise from different teams creating the text and illustrations, leading to confusion. The need for explicit coordinate systems is emphasized to avoid misunderstandings. Overall, clarity in definitions and illustrations is crucial for accurately understanding the mechanics of the robot.
Ineedhelpwithphysics
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
The textbook is telling me this is elbow up but when I search on the internet it shows me something else.
Relevant Equations
law of cosines, law of sines, Pythagorean theorem
Textbook: vvvvv
1696949125870.png


Online: VVVV
1696949162406.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which one is right?
 
Ineedhelpwithphysics said:
Which one is right?
Could you explain your question a little more?
What force is animating this mechanism?
 
This is strictly a matter of how these terms are defined by the text. The angles must correspond to the definitions provided. Possibly the book screwed it up: the illustrations and text are often done by different groups of people..This is why coordinate systems should be indicated explicitly..
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Family of lines that are at a distance of 5 from the origin'

I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
View full post »

Thread 'Making the denominator of a certain fraction real'

Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
View full post »

Similar threads

Building a Two Omni Wheel Robot: Questions & Answers
Replies
4
Views
2K
Inverse Kinematics: Oscillators and Multi-Bar Links
Replies
2
Views
1K
Inverse Kinematics of a 6 DOF Robotic Arm
Replies
1
Views
5K
Topology Introductory Topology online textbook recommendations
Replies
5
Views
511
Kinematics of pantograph device
Replies
1
Views
2K
Structural Support Triangles for a rope-climbing robot
Replies
2
Views
2K
Path following control robot kinematics and dynamics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Algebra Find Algebraic Physics Courses Starting with Classical Mechanics - Dan
Replies
14
Views
4K
Shouldn't f(t) = V have inverse f^{-1} (V) not f^{-1} (t)?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Is there any hope that textbook prices will ever drop?
Replies
23
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top