Two Parallel Wires: Magnetic Fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field at a point equidistant from two parallel wires carrying equal anti-parallel currents of 9.70 A, spaced 1.10 cm apart. The magnetic field at point P is derived using the formula for an infinite wire, specifically B = μi*I/(2πr). The correct approach involves recognizing that the y-components of the magnetic fields from each wire cancel each other out, while the x-components contribute to the total magnetic field. The final calculation yields a total magnetic field of 3.868e-5 T, although initial attempts were incorrect due to miscalculations and misunderstandings of the geometry involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying wires
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule (RHR) for determining magnetic field direction
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine, in relation to geometry
  • Ability to apply Pythagorean theorem in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the magnetic field from infinite wires using B = μi*I/(2πr)
  • Learn about the right-hand rule (RHR) and its applications in electromagnetism
  • Study the effects of geometry on magnetic field calculations, particularly in multi-wire systems
  • Explore the concept of superposition in magnetic fields and how to calculate net fields from multiple sources
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.

ShotgunMatador
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two long parallel wires are a center-to-center distance of 1.10 cm apart and carry equal anti-parallel currents of 9.70 A. Find the magnitude of the magnetic field at the point P which is equidistant from the wires. (R = 10.00 cm). (See Attachment for orientation)

I = 9.7 A
Distance from current source = √(.12+(.011/2)2) = 10.015 cm

Homework Equations


Binfinite wire= μi*I/2*pi*r

The Attempt at a Solution


Knowing the upper wire's magnetic field rotates counterclockwise and the lower wire rotates clockwise using RHR 2. So the y components at point P are equal but opposite. So we know the magnitude at Point P is going to be 2 times the x component of the magnetic field produced by either wire, which is represented as...

Btotal=2*μi*I*cos(θ)/(2*π*√(.12+(.011/2)2))

where cos(θ) = .1/√(.12+(.011/2)2))

So Btotal = 3.868e-5 T but it is telling me that is wrong.

Thanks for any help, it is greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 966
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your reasoning runs the same as mine and I get a different answer - recheck your working and makes sure you plugged int he right values for things you have not given values for above. Check your arithmetic too. Best practise is to do all the algebra before you plug in values - so derive the relation you need using the variables given in the problem statement (d, R etc) first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
ShotgunMatador said:
where cos(θ) = .1/√(.12+(.011/2)2))
I don't think this expression is correct.
Make sure that you're using a carefully drawn diagram when setting up the expression for cos(θ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
TSny said:
I don't think this expression is correct.
Make sure that you're using a carefully drawn diagram when setting up the expression for cos(θ).
So cosθ = adjacent/hypotenus
in this case adjacent is R=.1
hypotenuse is from half of the distance d (.011/2 = .0055) so using Pythagoreans theorem, I got Hyp = .10015 m. using that instead I get the same value, i think the cosine isn't the issue.
 
The wires centers and point P form an isosceles triangle.
If we define ##\theta## to be the half-angle at P,
Then ##\cos\theta = R/\sqrt{R^2+(d/2)^2}##
... which is an example of where doing the algebra with the variables makes things easier BTW.
Putting: d=0.011m and R=0.1m, and isn't that what OP wrote?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
ShotgunMatador said:
in this case adjacent is R=.1
Double check this. Can you post a picture of the triangle you are working with?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
TSny said:
Double check this. Can you post a picture of the triangle you are working with?

here you go
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 617
The θ in this diagram is not the angle you want to use in cos(θ) for calculating the net B field. Did you draw the B fields for each wire?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador and Simon Bridge
Oh I see what happened there ... I was wondering:
So the y components at point P are equal but opposite...
... easy to miss.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #10
so the top wire would be counter clockwise and the bottom would be clockwise. the y component of B for the top wire points up and the y component of B for the bottom points down, don't they cancel?
 
  • #11
ShotgunMatador said:
so the top wire would be counter clockwise and the bottom would be clockwise. the y component of B for the top wire points up and the y component of B for the bottom points down, don't they cancel?
Yes, they cancel.

But you need to draw the arrows representing the B-field vectors at P for each wire so that you can see the angle they make to the horizontal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #12
is the angle 45 because it will be tangent to the field line? aka there is a 90 degree angle between the two components
 
  • #13
ShotgunMatador said:
is the angle 45 because it will be tangent to the field line? aka there is a 90 degree angle between the two components
The B vectors are tangent to the circular field lines, but why would that produce a 45o angle? You might try making several sketches for different positions of P. Do the B vectors make the same angle with respect to the horizontal for all positions of P?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #14
okay so it isn't 90, I the angle for the field will be the other angle in that triangle (see sketch), but when I tried it, it too gave me the wrong answer.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 8.52.09 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 8.52.09 PM.png
    45.1 KB · Views: 775
  • #15
TSny said:
The B vectors are tangent to the circular field lines, but why would that produce a 45o angle? You might try making several sketches for different positions of P. Do the B vectors make the same angle with respect to the horizontal for all positions of P?
just kidding I plugged it in wrong.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K