Two Parallel Wires: Magnetic Fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two long parallel wires carrying equal anti-parallel currents and seeks to determine the magnetic field at a specific point equidistant from the wires. The context is rooted in electromagnetism, specifically the behavior of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the magnetic field at point P, questioning the correctness of expressions used for cos(θ) and the setup of the problem. There are suggestions to derive relations using variables before substituting numerical values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on checking calculations and ensuring correct diagrammatic representations. There is recognition of the need to clarify angles and components of the magnetic field vectors, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of accurately defining angles and components in the context of the problem, as well as the potential for misinterpretation of the geometry involved. There is also mention of the necessity for careful diagramming to visualize the relationships between the wires and point P.

ShotgunMatador
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two long parallel wires are a center-to-center distance of 1.10 cm apart and carry equal anti-parallel currents of 9.70 A. Find the magnitude of the magnetic field at the point P which is equidistant from the wires. (R = 10.00 cm). (See Attachment for orientation)

I = 9.7 A
Distance from current source = √(.12+(.011/2)2) = 10.015 cm

Homework Equations


Binfinite wire= μi*I/2*pi*r

The Attempt at a Solution


Knowing the upper wire's magnetic field rotates counterclockwise and the lower wire rotates clockwise using RHR 2. So the y components at point P are equal but opposite. So we know the magnitude at Point P is going to be 2 times the x component of the magnetic field produced by either wire, which is represented as...

Btotal=2*μi*I*cos(θ)/(2*π*√(.12+(.011/2)2))

where cos(θ) = .1/√(.12+(.011/2)2))

So Btotal = 3.868e-5 T but it is telling me that is wrong.

Thanks for any help, it is greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 986
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your reasoning runs the same as mine and I get a different answer - recheck your working and makes sure you plugged int he right values for things you have not given values for above. Check your arithmetic too. Best practise is to do all the algebra before you plug in values - so derive the relation you need using the variables given in the problem statement (d, R etc) first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
ShotgunMatador said:
where cos(θ) = .1/√(.12+(.011/2)2))
I don't think this expression is correct.
Make sure that you're using a carefully drawn diagram when setting up the expression for cos(θ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
TSny said:
I don't think this expression is correct.
Make sure that you're using a carefully drawn diagram when setting up the expression for cos(θ).
So cosθ = adjacent/hypotenus
in this case adjacent is R=.1
hypotenuse is from half of the distance d (.011/2 = .0055) so using Pythagoreans theorem, I got Hyp = .10015 m. using that instead I get the same value, i think the cosine isn't the issue.
 
The wires centers and point P form an isosceles triangle.
If we define ##\theta## to be the half-angle at P,
Then ##\cos\theta = R/\sqrt{R^2+(d/2)^2}##
... which is an example of where doing the algebra with the variables makes things easier BTW.
Putting: d=0.011m and R=0.1m, and isn't that what OP wrote?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
ShotgunMatador said:
in this case adjacent is R=.1
Double check this. Can you post a picture of the triangle you are working with?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
TSny said:
Double check this. Can you post a picture of the triangle you are working with?

here you go
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 6.38.47 PM.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 636
The θ in this diagram is not the angle you want to use in cos(θ) for calculating the net B field. Did you draw the B fields for each wire?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador and Simon Bridge
Oh I see what happened there ... I was wondering:
So the y components at point P are equal but opposite...
... easy to miss.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #10
so the top wire would be counter clockwise and the bottom would be clockwise. the y component of B for the top wire points up and the y component of B for the bottom points down, don't they cancel?
 
  • #11
ShotgunMatador said:
so the top wire would be counter clockwise and the bottom would be clockwise. the y component of B for the top wire points up and the y component of B for the bottom points down, don't they cancel?
Yes, they cancel.

But you need to draw the arrows representing the B-field vectors at P for each wire so that you can see the angle they make to the horizontal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #12
is the angle 45 because it will be tangent to the field line? aka there is a 90 degree angle between the two components
 
  • #13
ShotgunMatador said:
is the angle 45 because it will be tangent to the field line? aka there is a 90 degree angle between the two components
The B vectors are tangent to the circular field lines, but why would that produce a 45o angle? You might try making several sketches for different positions of P. Do the B vectors make the same angle with respect to the horizontal for all positions of P?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShotgunMatador
  • #14
okay so it isn't 90, I the angle for the field will be the other angle in that triangle (see sketch), but when I tried it, it too gave me the wrong answer.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 8.52.09 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-10-11 at 8.52.09 PM.png
    45.1 KB · Views: 789
  • #15
TSny said:
The B vectors are tangent to the circular field lines, but why would that produce a 45o angle? You might try making several sketches for different positions of P. Do the B vectors make the same angle with respect to the horizontal for all positions of P?
just kidding I plugged it in wrong.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K