Can Two Photons Really Form Bound States?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Scientists have successfully created two-photon bound states, referred to as "molecules of light," through interactions mediated by ultracold Rubidium atoms. This phenomenon challenges the conventional understanding of light, as photons typically do not self-interact. Theoretical implications include questions about the localization of photons, the existence of energy levels akin to electrons in atoms, and the nature of these states as either true photons or mixed photon-electron states. The interaction is characterized as a coherent process involving Rydberg states and non-linear optics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-linear optics
  • Familiarity with Rydberg states in quantum physics
  • Knowledge of photon interactions with matter
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the theoretical framework of photon localization in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of Rydberg states on photon behavior
  • Investigate the concept of pseudo-particles in quantum optics
  • Study the effects of different indices of refraction on photon propagation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum optics interested in the behavior of light and photon interactions in advanced materials.

Claustral
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
With great interest I read an article about a paper where scientists were able to create two photon bound states ("molecules of light").

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/sep/26/physicists-create-molecules-of-light

I was quite astonished since light normally does not self-interact (apart from Delbrück scattering, which is strictly speaking no direct interaction). Of course, in this experiment the interaction between the two photons is not direct either, but mediated via the interaction of the photons with the electrons in the ultracold Rubidium atoms. Still I wonder, how such a two photon bound state is described theoretically and how far one can go with the analogue of a normal molecule: Can one define an average distance between these two photons? It sounds at least strange, since photons are normally not localizable, are they? Are these states photons at all or merely mixed photon-electron states? How long can this bound state in principle live? Are there energy levels such as a electron bound to a nucleus has them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a coherent interaction between a highly excited atom (Rydberg state) and the coherent forward scattering of the follow-on photon.

It is a fine example of very "non-linear optics", and depends upon the states of the matter. It is probably best regarded as a new kind of pseudo-particle.

You can read the Nature article abstract here: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v502/n7469/full/nature12512.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the answer. I got access to the original article and it helps a lot.
 
When I read this it seemed like what they are describing is 2 photons with the appearance of being bound, not actually bound. Their progress through the medium is controlled by the medium in such a way that they exit together, but then there is no "bound" characteristic other than their proximity.

Am I missing something obvious?
 
meBigGuy said:
When I read this it seemed like what they are describing is 2 photons with the appearance of being bound, not actually bound. Their progress through the medium is controlled by the medium in such a way that they exit together, but then there is no "bound" characteristic other than their proximity.

Am I missing something obvious?

It reads that way to me, too. The the first photon parties with more than one atom at a time, creating the state and slowing the speed of the photon. Then they seem to suggest that the second photon stays behind the first because the state offers a different index of refraction than the surrounding cloud. Are they suggesting a lower index of refraction is fooling photon #2 into following as closely as possible to slower photon #1?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K