Tyson Says It's 'Very Likely' The Universe Is a Simulation

  • Thread starter Buzz Bloom
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,919
12,745
Tyson Says It's 'Very Likely' The Universe Is a Simulation
No he does not. He says that, given some conditions, it is very likely, but he does not claim that those conditions are very likely.

It's like saying "if a big asteroid hits New York city tomorrow, the city will probably get destroyed". This is true - but it does not imply a large probability that New York city gets destroyed tomorrow, because the asteroid impact itself is very unlikely.
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule, QuantumQuest, Evo and 2 others
  • #3
collinsmark
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,101
1,776
For those interested, here is a video stream of the debate in question.

 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom, Evo and Greg Bernhardt
  • #4
233
153
If the simulation was run using spacetime as the computational medium could we tell the difference?
Is it conceivable that we might one day say the universe is definitely not a simulation, but we can't rule out that it is an experiment?
 
  • #5
3
10
I would like to hold an annual Physics forum meeting in las vegas to see you guys in my simulation. ?:):rolleyes::DD:sorry:o0):wideeyed:
 
  • #6
869
554
If the simulation was run using spacetime as the computational medium could we tell the difference?

I don't see how. But I didn't see how to test the EPR paradox either.

Is it conceivable that we might one day say the universe is definitely not a simulation, but we can't rule out that it is an experiment?

I don't see how it is possible to rule out that it is an experiment. Somehow you'd have to show that this leads to a contradiction, and that seems impossible to do.
 
  • #7
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
22,129
3,301
I'm very disappointed that the OP hasn't been back to acknowledge that the OP and the original title were extremely misleading. If anything, the OP should have asked the mentors to change the title or to add a message that the OP is highly misleading. As it stands, the title is just flat out wrong and attempting to mislead the public for the goal of sensation. I find these practices disgusting and disappointing.
 
  • #8
1,532
636
No he does not. He says that, given some conditions, it is very likely, but he does not claim that those conditions are very likely.

It's like saying "if a big asteroid hits New York city tomorrow, the city will probably get destroyed". This is true - but it does not imply a large probability that New York city gets destroyed tomorrow, because the asteroid impact itself is very unlikely.
That's not really true, start at 1:38:00, his exact words were: "I think the likelihood may be very high, and my evidence for it is just: it's a thought experiment." He didn't come right out and say he thought it was likely, but he alluded to it. I think of it as a misstatement during an off-the-cuff remark rather than being interpreted incorrectly.
 

Related Threads on Tyson Says It's 'Very Likely' The Universe Is a Simulation

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
832
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Q
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top