B U235 Criticality: Neutron Capture and Alpha Emission

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Congrute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Criticality
Congrute
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
U235 is an Alpha Emitter, so how can it reach Criticality.
How does U235 reach criticality via neutron capture when its natural decay process is via alpha emission. I know that U235 will reach criticality in a suitably shaped container after a specific concentration has been reached. In addition, I've read that the original U235 bomb (little boy) was furnished with a neutron initiator but only so as to increase the fission efficiency. According to the text I've read, the bomb would have gone off without the neutron initiator, but with a lesser yield. So, how are the required neutrons generated in either case? What am I missing? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The alpha decay doesn't matter.

U-235 can decay via spontaneous fission, providing an initial neutron to start the chain reaction. You can't control the time of that, however. If you get a spontaneous fission event too early or too late your yield is much lower, and if you don't get spontaneous fission while the core is critical then you don't get a nuclear explosion at all. A separate neutron source can inject neutrons at the time of maximal criticality, and you are just left with the risk that spontaneous fission starts the chain reaction too early. The implosion design compresses the material faster which reduces this risk. A gun-type plutonium bomb wouldn't be practical because plutonium has too many spontaneous fission decays.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and vanhees71
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top