UCLA or UMN for graduate energy study/research

  • Thread starter Thread starter cram242
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Graduate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for selecting a graduate program in mechanical engineering, specifically between the University of Minnesota (U of MN) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Participants explore various aspects of the programs, including faculty expertise in heat transfer and fluid mechanics, job placement for graduates, and funding opportunities for thesis options.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights their interest in alternative energy research, specifically in heat transfer and fluid mechanics, and seeks insights on program strengths in these areas.
  • Another participant suggests that faculty members and program websites are good sources for information, though they acknowledge potential biases.
  • A participant currently at UCLA expresses uncertainty about the job placement success of graduates from the MAE MS program.
  • Discussion includes historical references to notable faculty at U of MN, such as Ernst Eckert and Richard Goldstein, who are recognized for their contributions to heat transfer.
  • Several participants from UCLA comment on the quality of their program in fluids and heat transfer but express concerns about budget cuts affecting class sizes and course availability.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the difficulty of obtaining funding for the MS thesis option, particularly for students who did not complete their undergraduate studies at UCLA.
  • Some participants note that professors may prefer working with PhD students over MS students due to the perceived level of involvement in research.
  • One participant shares their experience of struggling to find funding for their MS thesis, despite having an undergraduate background at UCLA in a different field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the programs at U of MN and UCLA, with no clear consensus on which program is superior. Concerns about funding and faculty preferences for MS versus PhD students are also debated without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors influencing their decisions, such as faculty biases, historical program strengths, and the impact of budget cuts on current offerings. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding job placement outcomes and funding opportunities.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective graduate students considering mechanical engineering programs, particularly those interested in energy research and funding opportunities for thesis work.

cram242
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I'm finishing my undergrad at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities double majoring in physics and mechanical engineering. I have been admitted to both U of MN and UCLA for their mechanical engineering graduate programs, and am hoping to get some insights and recommendations.

My primary interest areas are heat transfer and fluid mechanics, especially applied to alternative energy research. I have interest in solar, hydrogen, wind, and water (specifically the new underwater turbines), although geothermal and biogas wouldn't be totally out of the question. Does anyone have any advice on which program is strongest in which area? I found that the NRC ranks U of MN as the 8th best mechE program in the nation, while UCLA is 14th, but I haven't been able to find any breakdowns by focus area.

I figure with the student body sizes of each there has to be SOMEONE on here who has some useful info. Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You should be able to figure this stuff out by talking to faculty members and reading their websites.
 
I've been doing that, I just thought that someone in this scene might be able to offer a more objective view than the school's faculty members. I don't think many professors teach/research at an institution that they don't think is pretty great.
 
Anyone you talk to is going to be biased in some way. When I want an objective view of a faculty member, I will look up some of their publications to find out exactly what they're involved in. Your school library probably has access to this stuff.
 
i currently attend UCLA for my undergrad, but have no idea how decent they are in terms of its MAE MS graduates finding jobs
 
A former faculty of UMN, Ernst Eckert (a paperclip scientist) is famous for his work in heat transfer. I don't know the current state of the program, but a search of his former doctoral student Richard Goldstein shows him as an important figure in heat transfer. Also, Eckert's colleague Sparrow. Both of them current faculty at UMN.
 
Last edited:
I'm a grad student in the ME program a UCLA. I think we have a pretty good program in terms of Fluids, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics. The only problem is the budget cuts are really hurting us. Therefore class sizes are getting much bigger for the grad classes, and some grad classes (not the core ones) have been cut. Undergrad is even worse.
 
teknodude said:
I'm a grad student in the ME program a UCLA. I think we have a pretty good program in terms of Fluids, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics. The only problem is the budget cuts are really hurting us. Therefore class sizes are getting much bigger for the grad classes, and some grad classes (not the core ones) have been cut. Undergrad is even worse.

do you know how easy/common it is for students doing the MS thesis option to get funding?
 
I know a few that are doing the thesis option for the M.S.; however, they did their undergrad at UCLA. Therefore it was somewhat easy for them to get fellowships since they already knew the professor for some time. From what I've heard, most of the professors don't want to work with M.S. students because the work is just not as involved as a phd. Most of the M.S. students here do the examination plan instead.
 
  • #10
teknodude said:
I know a few that are doing the thesis option for the M.S.; however, they did their undergrad at UCLA. Therefore it was somewhat easy for them to get fellowships since they already knew the professor for some time. From what I've heard, most of the professors don't want to work with M.S. students because the work is just not as involved as a phd. Most of the M.S. students here do the examination plan instead.

well i did my undergrad at UCLA as well, but in physics and math, not ME, so i guess that doesn't count since i don't know any of the ME professors. I've already tried contacting a few profs for research positions, but none had openings and they all said its unlikely i will find someone else to fund me for just the MS thesis. Looks like i'll be forced to do the coursework-only MS...
 
  • #11
I should also add that the ones that got the fellowship did research with the same professor during their undergrad. If you want to still do research as a grad student, you still can. It may or may not count for anything, but I've seen rules bent several times. They may pay you or they may not. I was a lab assistant for one summer and it payed pretty well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K