Unbalanced force to find altitude of airplane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the altitude increase of an airplane that initially flies at a constant speed and then accelerates, resulting in an increased lift force of 30 kN. The lift force equals the airplane's weight when flying at constant speed, calculated as 29,400 N. As the airplane accelerates, the acceleration is determined to be 0.2 m/s² using Newton's Second Law. The participant expresses confusion about relating altitude to speed, particularly in the context of projectile motion equations, which are deemed inappropriate for this scenario. The conversation emphasizes the need to focus on the lift force and its relationship to altitude rather than free fall equations.
a_r_part
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An airplane with a mass of 3,000 kg flies horizontally at a constant speed. The airplane then increases its horizontal speed and the lift force produced by its wings increases to 30 kN, increasing the airplane’s altitude. How much has the airplane’s altitude increased by when it has an instantaneous upward velocity of 25 m/s?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
Since the airplane is flying at a constant speed, then the lift force equals the weight of the airplane. This means that the lift force prior to acceleration is the mass * gravity constant = 29400 N.

When the airplane increases horizontal speed, the lift force increases to 30 kN. This means, using Newton's Second Law, that the acceleration is 0.2 m/s/s.

This is where I get lost: the question asks about altitude given speed. The formulas for projectile motion come to mind, but I don't know how to set them up.

Could someone provide hints for me to arrive at the answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a_r_part said:
Homework Statement:: An airplane with a mass of 3,000 kg flies horizontally at a constant speed. The airplane then increases its horizontal speed and the lift force produced by its wings increases to 30 kN, increasing the airplane’s altitude. How much has the airplane’s altitude increased by when it has an instantaneous upward velocity of 25 m/s?
Relevant Equations:: F=ma

I haven't been able to find a solution.
Per forum rules, please post an attempt.
Hint : How much was the lift force before the plane's speed increased?
 
a_r_part said:
Since the airplane is flying at a constant speed, the lift force before acceleration is zero.
That would make it not so much an "airplane" as a "hole in the ground". The question specifically states "flying horizontally".
 
smotion.gif
 
a_r_part said:
This is where I get lost: the question asks about altitude given speed. The formulas for projectile motion come to mind, but I don't know how to set them up.
Stay away from the projectile motion equations. They apply to objects in free fall. An airplane in free fall is not a good thing, especially for its passengers.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003 and Einstein44
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top