Unbalanced Three-phase circuit.

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jfierro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Three-phase
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving an unbalanced three-phase circuit problem from Alexander's and Sadiku's "Fundamentals of Electric Circuits" (3rd edition). The user initially attempted to calculate line currents using two methods: phase voltage division and a complex coefficient matrix. The correct line current, I_a, was determined to be (64|80.1º) after correcting errors in vector algebra and matrix formulation. The final matrix setup was confirmed as accurate, leading to the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-phase circuit theory
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and phasor notation
  • Proficiency in using matrix operations for circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and cosine
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of complex numbers in electrical engineering
  • Learn about three-phase power calculations and their significance
  • Explore matrix methods for solving electrical circuits
  • Review vector algebra and its applications in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in power systems analysis will benefit from this discussion.

jfierro
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Unbalanced Three-phase circuit.

Homework Statement



This comes from "practice problem" 12.10 from Alexander's and Sadiku's Fundamentals of Electric circuits 3rd edition, chapter 12.

The problem statement is:

"Find the line currents in the unbalanced three-phase circuit of Fig. 12.26 and the real power absorbed by the load."

http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/8428/circuits.png

Homework Equations



- LCK

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is I can't get to the shown answer. I have followed two methods:

Getting I_AB and I_CA from the known phase voltages:

I_AB = (220|0º) / (5|-90º)
I_CA = (220|-120º)/(10|0º)

And then doing I_a = I_AB - I_CA.

The second method is to construct a 3x3 matrix with complex coefficients based on the three meshes shown in the circuit. For those of you familiar with mathematica notation my matrix is:

LinearSolve[{{-5 I, 5 I, 0}, {5 I, 10 + 5 I, -10 I}, {0, -10 I, 10 I}}, {220, 0, -110 + Sqrt[3]*0.5*I}]

where I is the imaginary number and the first solution would be I_a.

Both methods yield 11 + 44.866i, far different from the listed result.


Any idea of how the authors got to (64, 80.1º)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just did exactly what you said using my beautiful vector-capable TI-89 and got the book's answer. I assume you did something wrong with your vector math.
I_AB = (220|0º) / (5|-90º) =(44|90º)
I_CA = (220|-120º)/(10|0º) = (22|-120º)
I_a = I_AB - I_CA = (44|90º) - (22|-120º) = (64|80.104º)
 
Hmm it was indeed a problem of my vector algebra ^_^u. I was doing them by hand and when getting the imaginary part of I_CA I did only sin(-120º) and not 22sin(-120º)...

I made the same mistake when constructing the matrix, the matrix should've been:

\begin{bmatrix} -5j & 5j & 0 \\ 5j & 10+5j & -10j \\ 0 & -10j & 10j \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} I_a\\ I_b\\ I_c \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 220 \\ 0\\ -110 + 220\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}j \end{bmatrix}

Since sin(120º) = 0.5sqrt{3}.

Thanks! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
701
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K