Uncertainty of Grating Constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty of the grating constant (k=1/d) using standard deviation from multiple measurements. The standard deviation of the spacing between slits (d) is ± 5.031x10-16 m, with an average d of 3.403x10-6 m, resulting in a grating constant of k=2.939x105 lines/m. To find the uncertainty in k, the standard error is calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of the number of measurements, which is essential for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of standard deviation and its calculation
  • Familiarity with the concept of standard error
  • Basic knowledge of diffraction grating principles
  • Proficiency in using formulas for uncertainty propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about standard error calculation in experimental physics
  • Study uncertainty propagation techniques in measurements
  • Explore diffraction grating theory and applications
  • Investigate the impact of measurement precision on experimental results
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in experimental physics, particularly those involved in optics and measurements, will benefit from this discussion. It is also useful for anyone looking to understand uncertainty calculations in scientific experiments.

jdog6
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
All right, I have to calculate the uncertainty of the grating constant (k=1/d).

I know that the standard deviation of my 14 values of d(spacing bewtween 2 slits in a diffraction grating) is ± 5.031x10-16 m.

Average d = 3.403x10-6m .
k= 2.939x105lines/m.
How would I find uncertainty? 1/± 5.031x10-16 m?

Im really stuck here, please help.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well since you have 14 measurements of 'd', and those measurements yield a standard deviation of ± 5.031x10-16 m, your error in d will be the standard error. That is, your standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of measurements.
If this is an introductory course then\DeltaK = K*(\Delta R/R) would suffice as the uncertainty in your value of K.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K