Uncertainty of Photon Measurement & Its Impact on Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between photon wavelength, momentum, and the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. Shorter wavelengths correspond to higher momentum and kinetic energy, allowing for more precise position measurements of photons. However, this precision leads to increased uncertainty in the momentum of electrons upon photon absorption, as described by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The photoelectric effect illustrates that photons with sufficient energy can eject electrons from atoms, but their subsequent position and momentum remain unpredictable. The conversation also touches on the challenges of calculating probabilities for electron positions and the implications of photon interactions on electron behavior.
Gunman
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"If the photon has a short wavelength, and therefore a large momentum, the position can be measured accurately. But the photon will be scattered in a random direction, transferring a large and uncertain amount of momentum to the electron"

Homework Equations


I am unsure about this formula: [Uncertainty in the measurement ~ Wavelength of photon]


The Attempt at a Solution


How is this so? Is it because the electron can be anywhere along the wave before it scatters the wave? Therefore inducing the uncertainty?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember Momentum (p) = mass * velocity. Shorts wavelengths mean that photons needs more kinetic energy to get from point A to B because they go up and down so much (in shorter, choppier wavelengths).

What you are trying to find out is called the photoelectric effect, which Einstein came up with in 1905. Basically any photon of light that has a certain frequency (shorter wavelength = higher frequency) will have more kinetic energy and thus higher momentum.

Any photon above the "thresh hold frequency" will have enough quantized energy in it to be absorbed by an electron in an atom of say, some metal. Thus when it absorbs this photon with a high frequency it will fly off the atom and into the air with whatever kinetic energy it has left.

The "uncertainty" part comes in due to a physicist named Heisenberg (with the help of Niels Bohr). They said that any electron that flys off can can land anywhere. It is impossible to predict both the exact position and the momentum of any given electron or atom simultaneously. If we accurately measure one, the other accuracy of measurement will suffer and vice-versa.

In quantum mechanics, we can only predict using "probability" where an electron will land or where the atoms of molecules will be positioned next because of the randomness and haphazard style with which molecules move. Heisenberg and various double-slit model tests prove this to be fact. Einstein was uneasy with this fact and principle and refused to believe that God would "roll the dice" in cause and effect in quantum physics.

However, Bohr and Heisenberg to this day are considered correct while Einstein is not in this case.
 
Thanks for explaining what the uncertainty principle was for.=)
Just curious, how do you actually find the probability of the various positions it may land at? And the momemtum? If the photon is absorbed by the electron then how do you go about measuring the momentum and position of electron? And if the photon does return because it does not correspond to the energy difference between the levels, then the electron position and momentum are not affected by the photon? And the I don't get the part about how having shorter wavelength helps to decrease the uncertainty of the new position of electron.
Thanks for taking the time to answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top