Uncertainty principle,examining the «principle» part

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle Uncertainty
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its implications in quantum mechanics (QM), particularly in relation to experiments like Heisenberg's microscope and the Davisson–Germer experiment. Participants explore the connection between these experiments and the Kelvin-Planck statement of the second law of thermodynamics, questioning whether uncertainty was a consequence of these findings. The conversation also delves into the derivation of uncertainty principles through Fourier analysis and non-commuting operators, while challenging the fundamental nature of these principles and the methods used to observe electrons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of Fourier analysis
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics, specifically the second law
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle using Fourier analysis
  • Explore the implications of the Kelvin-Planck statement in thermodynamics
  • Investigate alternative methods for observing electrons without photons
  • Study the relationship between wave functions and uncertainty in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundational principles of quantum theory and thermodynamics.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
In some experiments like Heisenberg's microscope and Davisson–Germer experiment,we see that by using light to understand the actual path of electrons,the electrons are disturbed and so the result is changed(in the second case,the interference pattern is replaced by the distribution of classical particles.)
I want to know,can we compare this experiments to unsuccessful attempts for designing a heat engine with 100% efficiency and therefor proposing the kelvin-planck statement of the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Can we say that uncertainty was proposed as a result of such experiments and then QM was formulated somehow that it contains uncertainty principles and so the derivations of it can't be accounted as proofs?(I mean derivations using Fourier transformation and non-commuting operators)
So is there another way besides them to derive the minimum for the product of uncertainties?
If a method of «watching the electrons»is proposed that does not use photons,there is a possibility of its rejection.So why do we say that its fundamental to the nature?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I know about those.
But Heisenberg proposed his uncertainty relations unaware of the Schrödinger's work so he couldn't have wave functions in mind.
Also why do we call it «principle» if there are proofs via wave properties or non-commutativity of operators?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
855
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K