Uncertainty Principle: Position & Momentum of Photon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Uncertainty Principle as it relates to the position and momentum of a photon. Participants clarify that the principle is not about a single measurement but rather a statistical result, indicating that repeated measurements yield varying results. The relationship is defined by the equation σposition · σmomentum ≥ ħ, where ħ represents the reduced Planck's constant. This principle highlights that while individual measurements can be precise, the inherent uncertainty emerges when considering multiple identical experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with the Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of statistical analysis in experimental physics
  • Basic algebra for calculations involving speed and distance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of the Uncertainty Principle
  • Research statistical mechanics and its applications in quantum experiments
  • Learn about the implications of the Uncertainty Principle in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying Quantum Mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify common misconceptions about the Uncertainty Principle.

stone1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
There is something (among many things of course) that confuses me with the uncertainty principle as it pertains to position and momentum of a photon. If one shoots a photon of red light, for example, at a screen, one can see where exactly the photon hits the screen so position is known. Also, because the speed of light in vacuum is uniform at c, one can calculate, using simple algebra, the location of the photon in every step of the way. Where is the uncertainty here? I am not measuring the location of the photon inbetween but why should I, if c is a universal constant then c is a universal constant. Obviously, my reasoning is wrong, but I can't decide where my mistake is.
1. Is it something to do with measuring the exact time of the impact? But why should I care, again c tells me how long it took for the light to hit the screen.
2. Or maybe I cannot measure the exact distance to the screen? But then I should never be able to measure that distance, regardless of whether I am performing experiments with light or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hellow stone1,

This is a quite common misunderstanding in Quantum mechanics. I didn't really understand it until I read Griffith's book.

The uncertainty principle does not correspond to a single instance/experiment measurement, but it is a statistical results which states that if you repeat this experiment over and over again, you'll find that the results are scattered, not always the same value, with the product of the standard deviation of the measured position and momentum of IDENTICAL copies of the the experiment greater than or equal to h bar.
i.e.
<br /> \sigma_{position} \cdot \sigma_{momentum} \geq \hbar<br />

It has nothing to do with the apparatus used in the measurement, and for sure, your measurement of a single experiment is fully deterministic, it is just if you repeat it over and over again you would not get the same result
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
855
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
964
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K