Uncertainty Relations & Wave Packets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time duration of a laser pulse that spans the entire visible spectrum, specifically from 4.0 x 1014 Hz to 7.5 x 1014 Hz. The uncertainty relation used is ΔwΔt=1, leading to a calculated time duration of Δt=4.55 x 10-16 s. Participants debate the correct form of the uncertainty relation, with a consensus leaning towards the textbook version. Additionally, the importance of interpreting and commenting on the results of calculations is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with frequency and time domain relationships
  • Basic knowledge of laser physics and pulse duration
  • Ability to perform calculations involving scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the uncertainty relation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of pulse duration on laser applications
  • Learn about the effects of frequency range on wave packet characteristics
  • Investigate the differences between ΔwΔt=1 and ΔwΔt=2π in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, laser technology, and wave packet analysis.

Pi Face
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM:
Laser pulses of femptosecond duration can be produced, but for such brief pulses it
makes no sense to speak of the ‘color’ of the laser. To demonstrate this, compute the time duration of a laser pulse whose range of frequencies covers the entire visible spectrum (4.0*10^14 Hz to 7.5*10^14 Hz).

WORK:
I know I need to use the uncertainty relation for this problem, but in one of my prof's slides it says ΔwΔt=2π but in my textbook it says ΔwΔt=1. I'm siding with the textbook and hoping the slide just had a typo, does that seem correct?

Assuming ΔwΔt=1, w=2πf so 2πΔfΔt=1, and ΔfΔt=1/(2π). Because we are asked to calculate time, Δt=1/(2πΔf)
Δf=7.5*10^14 Hz - 4.0*10^14 Hz = 3.5*10^14 Hz
then,
Δt=1/(2π*3.5*10^14 Hz) = 4.55*10^-16 s

Is that all I have to do? The question is kinda long for such little work so I'm not sure if I'm missing something. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in one of my prof's slides it says ΔwΔt=2π but in my textbook it says ΔwΔt=1. I'm siding with the textbook and hoping the slide just had a typo, does that seem correct?
You can see for yourself by considering where the relation comes from.
Is that all I have to do? The question is kinda long for such little work so I'm not sure if I'm missing something. Thanks.
You do have a bit more work to do ... what was the purpose of doing the calculation? Has it fulfilled it's purpose?

In general, you should always comment on the results of any long-answer question: don't just leave the number hanging like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K