News Uncovering the Hidden Motives Behind the Iraq War

  • Thread starter Thread starter yu_wing_sin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of the Iraq War as unjust, driven by ulterior motives rather than genuine intentions of democracy. Key points include the belief that the U.S. aimed to control Iraq's oil resources, exert influence over Iran and Syria, and fulfill the ambitions of the military-industrial complex. Critics argue that the war primarily benefited wealthy elites and corporations rather than the American public or Iraqis. Despite the removal of Saddam Hussein, there is skepticism about whether the situation in Iraq has improved. Overall, the consensus is that the war was largely seen as a failure, lacking legitimate justification.
  • #151
I can't say Vanesch, it's not structured like a state. If it were up to me all action would be delayed until something was agreed upon. However, If you cause damage to the community, you will have to repair that damage. And it's zapatismo.

What is this 'Collective Violence' supposed to represent anyways?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
vanesch said:
And what if I do this in your Zapatisto system, and people vote against me doing that, and I say that I don't care about their system, I continue to do what I always did because it is the only way for me to make a great beer I'm fond of ? Am I, or am I not, going to face collective violence ?
That situation would not arise in a zapatismo system because private ownership of a resources, such as a river, is not recognized. You havn't answered my question.
 
  • #153
Smurf said:
What is this 'Collective Violence' supposed to represent anyways?

The same kind of response you would get as in a democracy, for instance when you go against the established rules. People (part time or full time police men and women) coming in, instructed by an authority (such as a people's convention) to use force upon me, going from simply taking me up and placing me somewhere, to shooting me down.
 
  • #154
Smurf said:
That situation would not arise in a zapatismo system because private ownership of a resources, such as a river, is not recognized. You havn't answered my question.

I do not need to "own" the river to pollute it. Imagine that I produce a lot of chemicals in order to produce my beer, and that I regularly dump them in the river, making the water unfit for consumption and I kill all the fish. I don't care because I don't like fish. Regularly, I come with my truck and dump the stuff. Is your people's assembly going to organize something to make me stop this or not ?
And don't come near my factory because I shoot on everybody that approaches...
 
  • #155
Smurf and Vanesch, you guys need to start your own thread and stop hi-jacking everyone elses to have your debate.
 
  • #156
Skyhunter said:
Smurf and Vanesch, you guys need to start your own thread and stop hi-jacking everyone elses to have your debate.

Ok, I guess you're right...

:blushing:
 
  • #157
Psst Vanesch, we should move this thread to Skyhunter's (soon to be) newly hijacked "Do tax cuts pay for themselves" thread.
 
  • #158
Or...you could PM Evo and ask her to split your posts from this thread to the new "stability of anarchy" thread. I've requested this on more than one occasion and have been kindly accommodated.
 
  • #159
Hmm, I don't think Evo likes me very much right now
 

Similar threads

Replies
115
Views
11K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top