einsteinian77
- 207
- 0
who is Murphy and does his law actually touch upon anything scientific?
The discussion revolves around Murphy's Law, exploring its origins, implications, and whether it has any scientific basis. Participants reflect on the nature of the law and its relevance to human experience and engineering challenges.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the scientific basis of Murphy's Law, with some expressing skepticism about its origins and others reflecting on its philosophical implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding its scientific validity.
Participants reference external links for further information, but there is no agreement on the interpretations or implications of Murphy's Law. The discussion includes subjective reflections that may not be universally applicable.
Originally posted by einsteinian77
ok, I'm still lost as to where all of those come from it sounds like some pissed off computer engineer did.