Understand Degeneracy of Metric at Schwarzschild Singularity

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I am reading this paper
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.4837.pdf
and I came across under eq12 that the new metric is degenerate...
How can someone see that from the metric's form?
Degeneracy for a metric means that it has at least 2 same eigenvalues (but isn't that the same for the Minkowski metric since it's diagonal with 3 times -1 eigenvalues)? Or that you can define two different metric tensors [itex]g[/itex] and [itex]\bar{g}[/itex] which keep [itex]ds^{2}[/itex] invariant?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh well then that means that my first choice was the correct one about Eigenvalues...
and why is the degenerate metric singular? or put in another manner, what does singular metric mean?
 
Last edited:
ChrisVer said:
Oh well then that means that my first choice was the correct one about Eigenvalues...
and why is the degenerate metric singular? or put in another manner, what does singular metric mean?
For the Minkowski metric, the eigenvalues are -1, +1, +1, +1 and det(g) = -1. Det(g) is a scalar density, transforming under a coordinate transformation as Det(g') = |∂x/∂x'|2 Det(g) where |∂x/∂x'| is the Jacobian of the transformation. Consequently there exists no nonsingular transformation that can take a singular metric to Minkowski. Wherever Det(g) = 0, the spacetime is not locally Minkowskian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person