Understand Semiconductor Elec. States at 0K and Room Temp

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sandakelum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Semiconductor States
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of the Fermi level in semiconductors at absolute zero (0K) compared to room temperature. Participants explore the implications of temperature on the energy states of electrons in the valence and conduction bands, as well as the definitions and roles of the Fermi level and chemical potential in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that at 0K, the highest energy state lies at the Fermi level, with all electrons occupying the valence band, while at room temperature, the highest energy state of the valence band lies below the Fermi level.
  • Others argue that the Fermi level can increase with temperature, suggesting that the energy level where half of the states are occupied shifts higher.
  • A participant questions the definition of the Fermi level in semiconductors, noting that it is often considered to be in the band gap and equating it to the chemical potential, which changes with temperature.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Fermi level, defined as the maximum energy level occupied at 0K, does not change with temperature, while the chemical potential does.
  • One participant proposes that if the Fermi level changes with temperature, then the energies of the valence band must also increase, leading to some electrons potentially moving to the conduction band.
  • A later reply challenges this view, stating that the energy of free electrons does not determine the position of the valence band edge and that heating may reduce the band gap without exceeding the Fermi level.
  • Another participant discusses the Fermi-Dirac distribution function, suggesting that the Fermi level is a parameter that changes with temperature, but questions its applicability to non-gas electron systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of the Fermi level and its relationship with temperature, with no consensus reached on the definitions and implications of these concepts in semiconductors.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved definitions regarding the Fermi level and chemical potential, as well as the implications of temperature on electron states and band structure in semiconductors.

sandakelum
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a semiconductor @ 0k highest energy state lie on fermilevel(all electrons @ valence band). but @ room temperature highest energy state of covelence band lie below the fermilevel. how can i understand this? pls help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fermi level can increase with temperature. More energy -> the energy level where half of the states are (or would be) occupied is higher.
Where is the problem?
 
sandakelum said:
In a semiconductor @ 0k highest energy state lie on fermilevel(all electrons @ valence band). but @ room temperature highest energy state of covelence band lie below the fermilevel. how can i understand this? pls help me.

What is your definition of Fermi level for semiconductors?
Note that according to the common use, the "Fermi level" in semiconductors is in the band gap. This is because what is called Fermi level in semiconductors is actually the chemical potential.
Even if you stick with the definition used for metals, Fermi level is the maximum energy level occupied at zero K. So it does not change with temperature, by definition.
The chemical potential is what changes with temperature.
 
The central task of basic semiconductor physics is to establish formulas for the position of the Fermi level EF relative to the energy levels EC and E
[...]
and causes the Fermi level EF to shift
Found here

Looks like the regular Fermi level.

Do you mean the Fermi energy? That is at T=0.
 
If fermi level is changing with temperature its ok. my quaestion was when temperature up energies of covalence band also up. so if highest energy electrons @ covalance band occupy near to fermilevel @ 0 K (fermi level is the upper ,argin of the fermi sea) when temperature up
higest covelence electrone energy must exceeds fermi energy.(some of them may have enough to go to conduction band).
 
IF I understand correctly you believe that:
The fact that some of the valence band electrons managed to reach the conduction band edge at non-zero Temperature and hence exceeding the Fermi Level , means that the valence band edge now has to be considered shifted up as well exceeding the Fermi level.
This is not the case. The energy of the "free" electrons do not define where the edge of the valence band resides on the energy scale.
Having said that, I have a couple of comments on the ongoing discussion.
1) Heating the material generally leads to reducing the band gap , thus the valence band edge may indeed go up a bit (but not exceeding the Fermi Level).
2) Heating the material does not necessarily implies elevating the chemical potential of electrons (Fermi level). It may be the case that self doping effects can lead to lowering the Fermi level by heating up the system.
 
Last edited:
nasu said:
What is your definition of Fermi level for semiconductors?
Note that according to the common use, the "Fermi level" in semiconductors is in the band gap. This is because what is called Fermi level in semiconductors is actually the chemical potential.
Even if you stick with the definition used for metals, Fermi level is the maximum energy level occupied at zero K. So it does not change with temperature, by definition.
The chemical potential is what changes with temperature.

As I read it somewhere, Fermi level is a (the sole) parameter of Fermi-Dirac distribution function, which should apply to electron gas only(?), and FL does change with temperature. (And as I remember it, at FL the occupancy rate of state is 0.5.)

For an electron system that cannot be treated as gas, the measured chemical potential could not be viewed as Fermi level, and thus Fermi-Dirac distribution function could not apply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
81K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K