Understand why the harmonic series diverges

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The harmonic series, defined as \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}\), diverges despite the individual terms decreasing towards zero. The misconception arises from the assumption that a series of decreasing terms must converge. The proof of divergence relies on the behavior of partial sums, which grow unbounded, as demonstrated by the integral test for convergence: \(\lim_{N \to \infty} \int_1^N \frac{dn}{n}\) is unbounded. This highlights the necessity of understanding the formal definition of convergence in relation to the sequence of partial sums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series and sequences in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of convergence and divergence
  • Knowledge of the integral test for convergence
  • Basic proficiency in limits and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of convergence in series
  • Explore the integral test for convergence in more detail
  • Investigate other series that diverge, such as the p-series
  • Learn about the relationship between partial sums and convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding series convergence, particularly those studying calculus or real analysis.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I understand why the harmonic series, \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ 1/n diverges as claimed in math books. What they did was grouping the fractions together and noting that they add up to 1/2, things like that.

But, my logic is this:

\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} 1/n = 0

and the elements in the harmonic series are decreasing gradually from 1 until it hits 0.

And, so since, it is decreasing gradually, logically, when you add all the terms together, the series must converge right?

how will harmonic series diverge?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the integral test for convergence?

Do you know why

\lim_{N \to \infty} \int_1^N \frac{dn}{n}

is unbounded?

--J
 
So, you've been shown the *proof* that it diverges - that the partial sums grow faster than summing a constant, yet you still think it ought to be convergent?

The problem is with the "logic" that adding up decreasing terms must converge. Nowhere in the definition of real numbers does it say that adding up decreasing numbers (tending to zero) must converge. That just isn't logic, it is a misapprehension you have about the real numbers.

A series converges iff the seqence of partial sums converges, that is the *definition*. By this example we can show your intuition doesn't fit the definition, so you need to reevaluate your intuition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K