ismaili
- 150
- 0
Dear guys,
Have you ever met this kind of tensor expression?
[tex]A_{[a <b>} C_{c]} </b>[/tex]
That is, indices [tex]a, b[/tex] are anti-symmetric, and indices [tex]b, c[/tex] are anti-symmetric as well. I am confused by this, should I think this expression as: I anti-symmetrise indices [tex]a, b[/tex] first, and then antisymmetrise indices [tex]b, c[/tex]? this would result in
[tex]\frac{1}{4} (A_{a b} C_{c} - A_{b a} C_c - A_{a c} C_{b} + A_{c a} C_{b})[/tex]
But, if I think of this expression by the meaning that I would get a minus sign whenever I exchange [tex]a, b[/tex], as well as I exchange [tex]b,c[/tex]. In this way, what I get should be
[tex]A_{[ab} C_{c]}[/tex]
So, which one is correct? I'm really confused...
Thanks for your help!
Have you ever met this kind of tensor expression?
[tex]A_{[a <b>} C_{c]} </b>[/tex]
That is, indices [tex]a, b[/tex] are anti-symmetric, and indices [tex]b, c[/tex] are anti-symmetric as well. I am confused by this, should I think this expression as: I anti-symmetrise indices [tex]a, b[/tex] first, and then antisymmetrise indices [tex]b, c[/tex]? this would result in
[tex]\frac{1}{4} (A_{a b} C_{c} - A_{b a} C_c - A_{a c} C_{b} + A_{c a} C_{b})[/tex]
But, if I think of this expression by the meaning that I would get a minus sign whenever I exchange [tex]a, b[/tex], as well as I exchange [tex]b,c[/tex]. In this way, what I get should be
[tex]A_{[ab} C_{c]}[/tex]
So, which one is correct? I'm really confused...
Thanks for your help!