Understanding basic statistical mechanics formulas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding key statistical mechanics formulas related to velocity and speed distributions. The first formula connects speed distribution to velocity distribution through a transformation involving spherical coordinates. The second formula addresses the significance of the angle in velocity vectors, emphasizing that it describes the fraction of molecules within a speed interval at a specific angle from an axis. The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is used to illustrate how to derive the distribution for any function of velocity. Overall, the conversation clarifies how to interpret these formulas and their implications in statistical mechanics.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-02-25 at 10.45.20 PM.png

Firstly, I would like to check my understanding of the first formula:
Using velocity distribution = f(v), speed distribution = fs(v):
fs(v) = f(vx)f(vy)f(vz)dxdydz, since dxdydz = 4pi*v^2*dv, fs(v) = 4piv^2f(v)

The second formula is the confusing one:
What does it mean? What is the significance/meaning of the "angle"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Velocity is a vector, which means it has magnitude and direction. As stated, (2.33) gives the fraction of molecules that are within a speed interval and moving at an angle between ##\theta## and ##\theta+d\theta## measured from some axis. Equation (2.33) does not take direction into account and gives you the distribution in all directions.
 
If you have the distribution ##f(\vec{v})## for the velocity, then you get the distribution for any function of ##u=F(\vec{v})## by
$$p(u)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 v f(\vec{v}) \delta[u-F(\vec{v})].$$
For the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution it's easy to calculate, because in this case
$$f(\vec{v})=N \exp[-m v^2/(2 k T)].$$
Then just introduce spherical coordinates ##v,\vartheta,\varphi## and ##F(\vec{v})=v## in the general formula
$$p(u)=\int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} v \int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta v^2 \sin \vartheta N \exp[-m v^2/(2kT)] \delta(u-v)=4 \pi N u^2 \exp[-m u^2/(2kT)].$$
 
let ##g : R \times R \rightarrow R, (\theta, |v|) \mapsto g(\theta, |v|)##, where ##v \in R^3## and ##|v| = \sqrt{\langle v,v \rangle}##. by spherical symmetrie, ##f(v) = H(|v|)## for some ##H##$$\begin{align*}

\mathbb{P}(a < |v| < b \text{ and } \theta \leq c) &= \int_0^c \int_a^b g(\theta, |v|) d|v| d\theta \\

&\overset{!}{=} \int_0^{c} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_a^b f(v) |v|^2 \sin{\theta} \, d|v| d\phi d\theta \\

&= \int_0^c \int_a^b 2 \pi |v|^2 f(v) \sin{\theta} \, d|v| d\theta

\end{align*}$$follow that $$g(\theta, |v|) = 2\pi |v|^2 f(v) \sin{\theta} = \frac{1}{2} \left(4\pi |v|^2 f(v) \right) \sin{\theta} = \frac{1}{2} f_s(|v|) \sin{\theta}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and vanhees71
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top