Understanding basic statistical mechanics formulas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding key statistical mechanics formulas related to velocity and speed distributions. The first formula connects speed distribution to velocity distribution through a transformation involving spherical coordinates. The second formula addresses the significance of the angle in velocity vectors, emphasizing that it describes the fraction of molecules within a speed interval at a specific angle from an axis. The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is used to illustrate how to derive the distribution for any function of velocity. Overall, the conversation clarifies how to interpret these formulas and their implications in statistical mechanics.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-02-25 at 10.45.20 PM.png

Firstly, I would like to check my understanding of the first formula:
Using velocity distribution = f(v), speed distribution = fs(v):
fs(v) = f(vx)f(vy)f(vz)dxdydz, since dxdydz = 4pi*v^2*dv, fs(v) = 4piv^2f(v)

The second formula is the confusing one:
What does it mean? What is the significance/meaning of the "angle"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Velocity is a vector, which means it has magnitude and direction. As stated, (2.33) gives the fraction of molecules that are within a speed interval and moving at an angle between ##\theta## and ##\theta+d\theta## measured from some axis. Equation (2.33) does not take direction into account and gives you the distribution in all directions.
 
If you have the distribution ##f(\vec{v})## for the velocity, then you get the distribution for any function of ##u=F(\vec{v})## by
$$p(u)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 v f(\vec{v}) \delta[u-F(\vec{v})].$$
For the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution it's easy to calculate, because in this case
$$f(\vec{v})=N \exp[-m v^2/(2 k T)].$$
Then just introduce spherical coordinates ##v,\vartheta,\varphi## and ##F(\vec{v})=v## in the general formula
$$p(u)=\int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} v \int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta v^2 \sin \vartheta N \exp[-m v^2/(2kT)] \delta(u-v)=4 \pi N u^2 \exp[-m u^2/(2kT)].$$
 
let ##g : R \times R \rightarrow R, (\theta, |v|) \mapsto g(\theta, |v|)##, where ##v \in R^3## and ##|v| = \sqrt{\langle v,v \rangle}##. by spherical symmetrie, ##f(v) = H(|v|)## for some ##H##$$\begin{align*}

\mathbb{P}(a < |v| < b \text{ and } \theta \leq c) &= \int_0^c \int_a^b g(\theta, |v|) d|v| d\theta \\

&\overset{!}{=} \int_0^{c} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_a^b f(v) |v|^2 \sin{\theta} \, d|v| d\phi d\theta \\

&= \int_0^c \int_a^b 2 \pi |v|^2 f(v) \sin{\theta} \, d|v| d\theta

\end{align*}$$follow that $$g(\theta, |v|) = 2\pi |v|^2 f(v) \sin{\theta} = \frac{1}{2} \left(4\pi |v|^2 f(v) \right) \sin{\theta} = \frac{1}{2} f_s(|v|) \sin{\theta}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and vanhees71
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top