Understanding Beam Deflection: Theory, History, and Formulas Explained

Click For Summary
Beam deflection theory has its roots in early attempts by Galileo, who incorrectly assumed constant shear stress across a beam's cross-section. The foundational principles were later refined by Euler, who introduced "engineer's beam theory," establishing that curvature is proportional to bending moment. Timoshenko further enhanced this theory around 1920, leading to the development of the Euler-Timoshenko beam theory. Understanding these historical contributions is crucial for grasping the underlying mechanics of beam deflection. The evolution of these theories highlights the importance of accurate assumptions in structural engineering.
mlog
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys so I've been looking everywhere on the internet, and i can't find any theory and history on beam deflection. I understand the formulas and all but what is the theory behind it, who discovered the first rational answer to explain things etc..

Please Help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Galileo probably made the first recorded attempt at a theory of beams, but he got it wrong (he assumed the shear stress was constant across the cross section of the beam, which isn't correct).

Euler formulated what is usually called "engineer's beam theory" (curvature is proportional to bending moment, etc), and Timoshenko added some refinements to it in about 1920 - hence the name "Euler-Timoshenko beam theory"
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K