Understanding Calculation of N (Number of Atoms)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KiNGGeexD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Calculation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the number of atoms (N) in a given context, specifically related to latent heat and surface tension. Participants are trying to clarify how N is derived and its relevance in the calculations presented in their notes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the origin of N in the calculations, with some suggesting it may relate to Avogadro's number. There are attempts to connect the density and volume calculations to the number of atoms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between moles, density, and the number of atoms. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Avogadro's number, but there is no explicit consensus on the calculations or assumptions being made.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of unclear notes and specific calculations that may not directly reference N, leading to confusion. The context includes the use of units such as J/mol, which influences the interpretation of N.

KiNGGeexD
Messages
317
Reaction score
1
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1395008862.765744.jpg


I was looking through my notes and came across this (above) I understand the calculation etc but I don't see where the number of atoms N was calculated?

I don't see where it has come fromAny help would be great thanks in advanced
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neat handwriting you are using to produce your notes...not nice you (they?) break the line between the minus sign and the 23, though...

28 gram is one mole
density is 0.81 g/cm3
so 28 gram is 28/0.81 = 35 cm3, right ? i.e. 35 cm3/mole

one mole is N_avogadro molecules and 35/(6 e23) = 5.8 e-23 cm3/molecule.

Take the ##\root 3 \of \ ## and you get something like 3.9 e-8 cm or 0.39 nm
 
It's the top calculation for latent heat I'm not sure about I get the surface tension one, but the one above makes no mention of N but must use it:)
 
Why don't you type the part of "your" notes that you have a question about ? I can hardly read what is to the left of ##{1\over 2} nN\epsilon##. Anyway, since we are talking J/mol, N=NA.
 
Would N in the top equation not be just Avergadros number?
 
Yes. Since we are talking J/mol, N=NA.
 
Ahh ok this calculation must just be rounded up because using avergadros number just now I obtained

1.95E-21 J

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K