Understanding D0-branes and Kappa-Symmetry

[haushofer]

Hi,

I'm reading Becker2Schwarz, chapter 5.1, about D0 branes in the GS formalism. They introduce kappa-symmetry, and end the section with "without this symmetry there would be the wrong number of propagating degrees of freedom".

I'm trying to understand that. The fermions \Theta^a have, for D=10, 2^5=32 complex components. But they are Majorana-Weyl, so this brings this number back to \frac{32}{4}=8 complex components. Kappa-symmetry implies that half of these fermions are gauge degrees of freedom, giving us 8 real components.

However, for the D0-brane, which is a particle, we start with 10 real components X^{\mu}. Choosing e.g. the static gauge brings this back to 9 components. Obviously, to have as many bosonic degrees of freedom as fermionic (8 real), I need to get rid of another bosonic degree of freedom. How do I do that?

Perhaps I'm also confused by worldsheet SUSY versus target space SUSY; to realize target space SUSY on \{\Theta^a,X^{\mu}\} one doesn't need this kappa symmetry, right?

Any help is appreciated :)

 

[haushofer]

Let me add something: for the massless case m=0, one can write down the superparticle in both RNS and GS formalism, and also realize both worldline- and targetspace SUSY. (this is also treated in chapter 4 of BBS). In this case the counting works: a massless particle has 8 bosonic degrees of freedom, and so has the spinor.

For the massive case one realizes target space SUSY via

<br /> \delta \Theta^A = \epsilon^A, \ \ \ \ \delta X^{\mu} = \bar{\epsilon}^A\Gamma^{\mu}\Theta^A<br />
where A=1,...,N labels the amount of SUSY. This algebra implies that a translation P on Theta is zero, so Theta is a zero eigenvector of P, and hence that P is not invertible. Then one doesn't need to have the same amount of X-components and Theta-components, right? I wouldn't know how to realize now wordline supersymmetry.

Maybe this section of BBS is a bit unclear; it now seems to me that this kappa symmetry is not per se about obtaining the same amount of X- and Theta components, but just about obtaining the right amount of SUSY. Does that make sense?

 

[Harv]

"without this symmetry there would be the wrong number of propagating degrees of freedom"

The number of propagating degrees of freedom are determined by the equation of motion (5.18).

 

[haushofer]

And (5.15) for the X, of course. But I can't fully understand what is "wrong" if kappa symmetry is not there for the massive D0-brane. Is it because the D0-brane breaks N=2 SUSY to N=1 SUSY, and that kappa symmetry takes care of this in the GS formalism?