Understanding De Broeglie Wavelength & Electron Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shark 774
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelength
Shark 774
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Electrons orbits are only allowed when a stable standing wave is formed around the nucleus, i.e. when the orbit circumference is an integer multiple of the electron's de broeglie wavelength. But is it possibly for it to temporarily exist in an orbit that is NOT an integer multiple of its wavelength and then VERY quickly decay to a stable orbit, or does it this just completely impossible?

(Note: I am only at a high school physics level)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shark, The idea that electrons in atoms travel in orbits about the nucleus was an early step before anyone understood how different quantum mechanics was. All that was known at that time was that only certain values of the energy were permitted. The Bohr model of the atom tried to explain this by picturing the atom as a miniature solar system, pretty much obeying classical mechanics except that the electron was required to be at values of the radius determined by the deBroglie wavelength. The Bohr model was a partial success in that it explained the energy levels, but failed on many of the details.

It was soon replaced by the Schrodinger theory, which roughly pictures an atomic level as an electron cloud. The electron does not go zipping around and around t he nucleus, and is not required to stay at a single radius, but has a probability spread over a range, which may even include r = 0.
 
Cool thanks! That really blows my year 12 understanding out of the water.
 
if the nucleus loses or gains a charge all orbiting electrons will be in unallowed orbits.

some may even be below the lowest allowed orbit and will have to move upward (radiating energy as they do)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top