Bohr model electron wavelengths

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electron wavelengths in the context of the Bohr model of the atom. Participants explore the relationship between electron orbits, energy levels, and the associated wavelengths, while also referencing historical developments in quantum theory. The conversation touches on the relevance of the de Broglie matter wave model and its implications for understanding the Bohr model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if orbits contain an integer multiple of wavelengths, then the wavelength at each energy level can be expressed as $$\lambda_n=\frac{2\pi n\hbar}{m_ec\alpha}$$, questioning whether this is a standard part of the theory.
  • Another participant argues that the de Broglie matter wave model is misleading and unnecessary for the Bohr model, suggesting that better models exist.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about the historical context of the theory and seeks clarification on what is misleading about the de Broglie model.
  • One reply indicates that the de Broglie model can lead to misunderstandings regarding wave-particle duality, although it acknowledges the difficulty in avoiding misleading interpretations.
  • A historical timeline is provided, detailing the development of the Bohr model, de Broglie's wave hypothesis, and subsequent theories by Schrödinger and Heisenberg, suggesting that de Broglie's waves were not a standard part of the Bohr model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance and accuracy of the de Broglie matter wave model in relation to the Bohr model. There is no consensus on whether the wavelength at each energy level is a standard part of the theory, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the de Broglie model.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the historical development of quantum theory and the transition from the Bohr model to more advanced models, indicating that certain assumptions about electron behavior may not hold in later theories.

copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi

I know that in the Bohr model, electrons move between energy levels, but you don't hear much about the electron's wavelength at each particular level. If we assume the orbits contain an integer multiple of wavelengths, you get the usual $$2\pi r=n\lambda,$$ so, based on the expression for the Bohr radius, the wavelength at each level should be $$\lambda_n=\frac{2\pi r}{n}=\frac{2\pi n\hbar}{m_ec\alpha}.$$ Does anyone know if this a standard part of the theory? I've just never assumed the wavelength had to be fixed at each energy level, but that seems reasonable if each level has a fixed energy.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
copernicus1 said:
Hi

I know that in the Bohr model, electrons move between energy levels, but you don't hear much about the electron's wavelength at each particular level.
That is because the deBroglie matter wave model is misleading. You don't need it for the Bohr model and for anything else we have better models.
 
Sure, I understand all that. I'm just curious about the theory more or less as an historical artifact.

Actually, what do you mean when you say the de Broglie matter wave model is misleading? I know you don't need it for the Bohr model since he got from the Balmer series, but what's misleading about it?
 
copernicus1 said:
Actually, what do you mean when you say the de Broglie matter wave model is misleading?
It leads to misunderstandings along the lines of "wave-particle duality"... particles passing through many slits at the same time, interfering with themselves... that sort of thing. Mind you, it is difficult not to be misleading ...
Does anyone know if this a standard part of the theory?
FWIW: it is not part of the standard theory. There are theories it is a standard part of... but I don't know anyone who uses it outside of year I physics classes.
 
It helps to know the timeline:

1913: Bohr publishes his original model with circular electron orbits which were determined by quantizing the orbital angular momentum. Sommerfeld later extends the theory to include elliptical orbits, with a second quantum number.

1924: de Broglie proposes that the electron is actually a wave, and that Bohr's original quantization condition comes from requiring an integer number of wavelengths around a circular orbit. I don't know if he ever generalized this to elliptical orbits.

1925-26: Schrödinger comes up with a differential wave equation for "electron waves." His model no longer has electron "orbits" in the sense of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model. The wave function is distributed around the nucleus in three dimensions. During the same period, Heisenberg comes up with his "matrix mechanics" approach.

After this, physicists abandoned the Bohr-Sommerfeld model very quickly. I don't think one can say that de Broglie's waves were ever a "standard part" of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model. Someone might have attempted to come up with a serious theory along those lines if Schrödinger and Heisenberg hadn't come up with their theories so quickly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K