MHB Understanding Dominant Matrices for Year 11 Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zashmar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
A dominant matrix, specifically in the context of row diagonal dominance, requires that for each row, the absolute value of the diagonal entry must be greater than or equal to the sum of the absolute values of the other entries in that row. This is mathematically expressed as |a_{ii}| ≥ ∑|a_{ij}| for all i, where a_{ij} represents the matrix entries. The term "diagonal dominance" can refer to both weak and strict forms, with strict dominance requiring a strict inequality. Understanding this concept is crucial for Year 11 students studying matrices, as it has implications in various mathematical applications. Mastery of dominant matrices enhances comprehension of matrix behavior in equations and systems.
Zashmar
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to a year 11 student what a dominant matrix is exactly?
my textbook is not making much sense, i understand basic matricies and how you times them and rearange equations.

Thank you so much(Happy)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you referring to diagonal dominance, and if so, is it row or column?
 
Yes diagonally dominant, what does it mean
 
Let's say it is row diagonal dominance.

For the $n$th row, the magnitude of the entry in the $n$th column must be greater than or equal to the sum of the magnitudes of all other entries in that row.

This must be true for all rows. Stated mathematically:

$\displaystyle |a_{ii}|\ge\sum_{j\ne1}|a_{ij}|$ for all $i$.

where $a_{ij}$ denotes the entry in the $i$th row and $j$th column.

Note that this definition uses a weak inequality, and is therefore sometimes called weak diagonal dominance. If a strict inequality (>) is used, this is called strict diagonal dominance. The unqualified term diagonal dominance can mean both strict and weak diagonal dominance, depending on the context.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K