Understanding Electrostatic Waves: A Personal Experience

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the term "electrostatic wave" and its implications, particularly focusing on the perceived contradiction in the term itself. Participants share personal experiences and reflections on feelings of ignorance and understanding within the context of scientific terminology and communication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration over the term "electrostatic wave," suggesting it is an oxymoron since "electrostatic" implies a static field, which should not produce waves.
  • Another participant distinguishes between feeling "dumb" and being "ignorant," emphasizing that ignorance is simply a lack of knowledge and that learning is a positive outcome.
  • Several participants reflect on the importance of understanding how technical terms may confuse non-technical readers and the need for clear communication in scientific contexts.
  • Some participants share personal feelings of inadequacy when engaging with the forum, noting that the community is supportive and encourages questions without judgment.
  • There is a recurring theme of feeling overwhelmed by the knowledge of others in the forum, with some participants humorously acknowledging their own struggles with subjects like math and hardware.
  • One participant suggests that the term "standing electrostatic wave" might provide some clarification, although they acknowledge it may not be significantly better.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the appropriateness of the term "electrostatic wave." While some acknowledge the confusion it may cause, others defend its common usage. The discussion reflects a range of personal experiences and feelings about knowledge and learning, with no clear consensus on the term itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of context in understanding scientific terminology and the potential for confusion among different audiences. There is also a recognition of personal limitations in various subjects, particularly math and practical skills.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the nuances of scientific terminology, those reflecting on their own learning experiences, and members of educational communities seeking to foster supportive environments for inquiry.

leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
So I was reading a journal article and I saw the phrase "electrostatic wave", and I became somewhat disgruntled and ranted a little bit to the guys I share an office with, since the phrase is seemingly an oxymoron...'electrostatic' implies a time invariant field and therefore a 'wave' cannot be produced. Well, a few hours later I decided to look the term up in google and apparently it is a very commonly used term. I feel dumb. Sometimes I just get too carried away about little things like this.

:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's a difference between feeling dumb and feeling ignorant. I feel dumb when I'm not able to understand something that I feel should not be that hard to get. Ignorant is just you didn't know something. You can't know everything, no matter how smart you are. Even the most gifted individuals are ignorant in some areas. But you looked it up and now you learned something you didn't know. ... so you should feel good that now you're that little bit less ignorant of something than you used to be!

I'm kind of fussy with the use of the words "dumb" and "ignorant." When someone calls someone else dumb for not knowing something (like, say, the capital of france)... well that's not dumbness, that's ignorance. that person can have an IQ of 160 for all you know, and it just so happens that they don't know a thing about world geography.... but it's been a looooong night of BBQing and loud music and drinking and eating incredibly unhealthy foods, and I'm way too tired. so I doubt any of this I wrote makes too much sense.
 
I don't think he was referring to the lack of knowledge of the term, but to his ranting and raving about it without having bothered to look it up to see what it actually means. Hopefully his office mates just took it as a joke, or else he has now learned to look up the meaning of a term before criticizing its use in the future. :biggrin:

It is sometimes helpful to be aware of how a term appears to the non-technical reader (even if you're supposed to be technically-minded when doing the reading). There will be times in one's scientific career when it is important to write a non-technical version of what you're doing, so keeping in mind the confusion such terms can cause will help remind you to avoid them without an appropriate explanation when you need to prepare such non-technical descriptions of your work. Once you've been doing something for a while, you tend to forget that not everyone knows the meaning of some terms, so maybe an experience like that will benefit you to keep it stuck in your head that it's not blatantly obvious to everyone. :smile:
 
I feel dumb as a stump every time I log into PF. It's very humbling to go from being the smartest guy in my neighbourhood to being a total dunce with a couple of keystrokes. That's why I love it so much; it's a learning experience every time. And the best part is that I (along with any newcomers) am treated more of less as an equal while being taught. The folks here go out of their way to make you not feel stupid for asking a legitimate question.
 
Moonbear said:
I don't think he was referring to the lack of knowledge of the term, but to his ranting and raving about it without having bothered to look it up to see what it actually means. Hopefully his office mates just took it as a joke, or else he has now learned to look up the meaning of a term before criticizing its use in the future. :biggrin:

It is sometimes helpful to be aware of how a term appears to the non-technical reader (even if you're supposed to be technically-minded when doing the reading). There will be times in one's scientific career when it is important to write a non-technical version of what you're doing, so keeping in mind the confusion such terms can cause will help remind you to avoid them without an appropriate explanation when you need to prepare such non-technical descriptions of your work. Once you've been doing something for a while, you tend to forget that not everyone knows the meaning of some terms, so maybe an experience like that will benefit you to keep it stuck in your head that it's not blatantly obvious to everyone. :smile:

Except in this case, the term is more confusing to a person who understands the terms than to a non-technically minded reader.

Not that I'd come up with a better name, but some try to add some clarification by calling it a standing electrostatic wave. Not much better.
 
Danger said:
I feel dumb as a stump every time I log into PF.
yea, some members here are like walking encyclopedias :bugeye:
 
Moonbear said:
I don't think he was referring to the lack of knowledge of the term, but to his ranting and raving about it without having bothered to look it up to see what it actually means. Hopefully his office mates just took it as a joke, or else he has now learned to look up the meaning of a term before criticizing its use in the future. :biggrin:

It is sometimes helpful to be aware of how a term appears to the non-technical reader (even if you're supposed to be technically-minded when doing the reading). There will be times in one's scientific career when it is important to write a non-technical version of what you're doing, so keeping in mind the confusion such terms can cause will help remind you to avoid them without an appropriate explanation when you need to prepare such non-technical descriptions of your work. Once you've been doing something for a while, you tend to forget that not everyone knows the meaning of some terms, so maybe an experience like that will benefit you to keep it stuck in your head that it's not blatantly obvious to everyone. :smile:

Yes, it was actually by ranting about the term and later realizing it was a commonly used term, even if it is an illogical term.
 
moe darklight said:
yea, some members here are like walking encyclopedias :bugeye:

You speak truly, m'man. Astro has to be the grand champion on that one. He can pull **** out of his beard that mere mortals don't even know exists. At the same time, we PM back and forth and he treats me as a friend rather than the dummy in the corner.
That's what the whole PF scene is about. Nobody is ever made to feel stupid or inadequate for asking a question, however rudimentary, to which s/he wants a straight answer. People who think that they're the cat's ass are sent scuttling into the bushes very quickly. Only when one asks a question and refuses to accept the expert answers is one shot down in flames. Even then, it's done in a civilized manner.
 
Danger said:
He can pull **** out of his beard that mere mortals don't even know exists.

:smile::smile::smile::smile::smile:
 
  • #10
Feeling stupid is really bad, but being stupid must be great these days!:-p
 
  • #11
Danger said:
Astro has to be the grand champion on that one. He can pull **** out of his beard that mere mortals don't even know exists.

I agree with this. Astrodude amazes me with his beard every time I read one of his posts.
 
  • #12
The only thing that truly makes me feel stupid is math. I never feel stupid with other subjects... most other subjects I grasp fairly easily and learn fast. But I feel like a monkey when it comes to numbers and it's frustrating sometimes.

and working with hardware too. I'm a disaster with building things, and working on a car or tools or something like that.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
moe darklight said:
The only thing that truly makes me feel stupid is math... ...and working with hardware too. I'm a disaster with building things, and working on a car or tools or something like that.

Everyone has his/her niche. I'm very mechanically inclined, so we differ on that. What is similar (although you're probably ahead of me) is that I have a grade 9 math education. The only trouble that I ever got into in high-school was for assaulting a math teacher at the beginning of grade 10, and I never took the subject since. (It was in defense of a fellow student, by the way, and the principal agreed with me. Unfortunately, the math faculty didn't.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
28K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K