Understanding Feynman's Relativistic Electric Field Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Feynman's Relativistic Electric Field Equation, specifically Equation 28.3 from Feynman's Lectures, Volume 1. The key takeaway is that the third term in this equation is crucial for understanding radiation laws, as it varies inversely with distance, denoted as ##r'##. Participants emphasize the importance of differentiating between far field and near field effects in electromagnetic radiation, with references to the Liénard–Wiechert potential and the propagation of radio waves. Additionally, the discussion highlights the elegance of the equation and its historical context, noting its first publication by Oliver Heaviside in 1902 and its rediscovery by Feynman around 1950.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman's Lectures, particularly Volume 1, Chapter 28.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of far field and near field in electromagnetic theory.
  • Knowledge of the Liénard–Wiechert potential and its implications for radiation.
  • Basic grasp of Maxwell’s Equations and their solutions involving currents and charges.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Liénard–Wiechert potential in detail to understand its role in electromagnetic radiation.
  • Research the differences between near field and far field effects in electromagnetic theory.
  • Examine Equation 28.6 in Feynman's Lectures to see the derivation involving the ##1/r## term.
  • Explore historical context and significance of Feynman's work in relation to Oliver Heaviside's contributions.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, researchers interested in radiation laws, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of Feynman's contributions to classical physics.

bryanso
Messages
28
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Want to understand why the radiation term in Feynman's relativistic electric field equation (Eq. 28.3) is inversely proportional to distance
Feynman's Lectures, vol. 1 Ch. 28, Eq. 28.3 is

Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 1.13.43 PM.png

##r'## is the distance to the apparent position of the charge. Feynman wrote,

"Of the terms appearing in (28.3), the first one evidently goes inversely as the square of the distance, and the second is only a correction for delay, so it is easy to show that both of them vary inversely as the square of the distance. All of the effects we are interested in come from the third term, which is not very complicated, after all. What this term says is: look at the charge and note the direction of the unit vector (we can project the end of it onto the surface of a unit sphere). As the charge moves around, the unit vector wiggles, and the acceleration of that unit vector is what we are looking for. That is all. Thus

Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 1.19.38 PM.png

is a statement of the laws of radiation, because that is the only important term when we get far enough away that the fields are varying inversely as the distance."

I don't understand why this acceleration is inversely proportional to ##r'##?

Is that simply because the size of an object is inversely proportional to distance (perception) thus acceleration should be the same? Shouldn't ##\frac{1}{r}## appear somewhere?

(BTW this equation is extremely elegant but doesn't seem to be widely described in other texts.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I have long since forgotten so cannot give you a simple answer. But a hint of what to look for may help.

You need to be searching (internet, wiki etc) for far field as opposed to near field.

It is the far field which allows radio waves to propagate vast distances with enough signal strength to be picked up by receivers. The near field falls to negligible much quicker.

See Liénard–Wiechert potential and Electromagnetic radiation - Near and far fields and Near and far field and Near-Field vs. Far-Field.

Also, if you read further you get to Equation 28.5, which has the same third term you quote; and 28.6, derived from it, which has the 1/r term included. I haven't worked through the derivation to see how it arrives - I suspect it comes from the definition of er' and its derivative d^2/dt^2 er'.

See Chapter 21 - Solutions of Maxwell’s Equations with Currents and Charges in Volume 2 which repeats the equations as 21.1 and 21.1' - they are the same as in Volume 1 Chapter 28.

There are a number of web sites which list errors in the various editions of Feynman's (wonderful) Lectures.

Also, I don't think this should be in Special and General Relativity - it should be in Classical Physics where you will also find numerous similar posts - search on radiation.
 
Last edited:
bryanso said:
I don't understand why this acceleration is inversely proportional to ##r'##?
Read further and you will see how the third term in Eqn 28.3 evaluates to Eqn 28.6 where you see the 1/r term.

Clipboard02.png


bryanso said:
(BTW this equation is extremely elegant but doesn't seem to be widely described in other texts.)
See the footnote in Vol 2, Chap 21
The formula was first published by Oliver Heaviside in 1902. It was independently discovered by R. P. Feynman, in about 1950, and given in some lectures as a good way of thinking about synchrotron radiation.

As an aside, I often find it useful not to worry too much if, on my first reading, I don't understand the full detail of something. I find it useful to continue as the following information often helps to elucidate the meaning. When I then go back it is usually easier to understand it.

Don't forget Rutherford's quotation:

All of physics is either impossible or trivial. It is impossible until you understand it, and then it becomes trivial.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
Thanks a lot. Great insights.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K