Understanding Fourrier Transforms in Quantum Mechanics: Help Needed!

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Fourier transforms in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the hydrogen ground state wave function and its transformation into momentum space.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks clarification on how to perform a Fourier transform on the hydrogen ground state wave function. Participants discuss the integral form of the Fourier transform and the appropriate constants involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the conventions of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics. There is a recognition of differing conventions regarding the prefactor in the transform, and some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's understanding, while others confirm the need for normalization of wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific literature, such as a textbook reference, which may provide additional context or formulas relevant to the discussion. Participants also note the importance of ensuring the correct signs in the exponentials of the Fourier transform equations.

Fys
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am studying Quantummechanics, but I don't see how Fourriertransforms in quantum mechanics work

I want to know how I can Fourier Transform the Hydr. ground state, so the transform of
[tex]\phi\left(r\right)=\left(\frac{1}{\pi a_{0}^3}\right)^\frac{1}{2} e^\left-(\frac{r}{a_{0}}\right)[/tex]

Does someone knows the answer

thanks,

Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Fouriertransform is used to convert one function in a certain space into the same function in one other space.

To represent the hydrogen ground state in p-space (momentum space) you evaluate the following integral over the whole space:

psi(p) = (2 pi h)^{-3/2} \int {exp(ip.r/h)*phi(r) dr}.

Where the expression for the hydrogen ground state is to be inserted at phi, h represent the reduced placks constant and the expression p.r is a scalar product between the two vectors p and r.

Hope you find yourself wiser after reading this!

/The Latex-rookie
 
He Reid thanks

but should it not be (2 pi h)^{-1/2}?
Do you know where on the net I can find this formula

Thanks for the help
 
It doesn't really matter which factor you put in front of the transform, as long as you make sure that the factor of the inverse transform is such that transforming forth and back subsequently yields the same answer. It's a matter of convention and convention differs in different areas of physics. In this case, Reid suggested ( (2 pi h)^{-1/2} )^3 because you are working in three dimensions. Other common factors include (2pi)^{-1/2}, (2 pi i)^{-1/2}.
 
Hi again,
sorry I don't know where to find it on the net. It is the eq. (2.59) in the book Quantum mechanics, second edition by Bransden & Joachain.

As CompuChip writes, the coefficient in front of the integral is just for later convinience.

I must however confess to a mistake: the exponent should be negative, i.e.
psi(p) = (2 pi h)^{-3/2} \int {exp(-ip.r/h)*phi(r) dr}. I hope I haven't mislead you too bad.

It is the in the exponent of the Fouriertransform from the p-space to r-space where the exponent should be positive, i.e.
phi(r) = (2 pi h)^{-3/2} \int {exp(ip.r/h)*psi(r) dr}.

Have a nice day! :)
 
The constant infront you can always put in there afterwards, since you demand the wavefunctions to be normalised. The constant depends on what dimensions you have. For 1-dim sqrt(2pi*hbar) is mostley used for example.

The momentum-wave function is the Fourier transform of the position-wave function, so the exponential should have minus sign.

And vice versa, the position-wave function is the inverse Fourier transform of the momentum-wave function, so no minus sign in the exponential.

So what I told you here is just a confirmation on what CompuChip and Reid told you =) Go a head and try, if you don't get the correct answer, post your attempt here and we'll try to help you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K