Understanding intake manifold principles.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bret Williamson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifold
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the principles of intake manifold designs for Ford 4-cylinder engines, specifically the T-, A-, and B- engines. Participants explore the effectiveness of dual-carburettor systems, highlighting two configurations: one with a common plenum and another with a cross-over pipe linking the intake runners. The cross-over pipe serves to balance pressure in the runners, ensuring uniform induction of the air-fuel mixture across cylinders. The conversation emphasizes the historical context of these designs, particularly the advancements made in the 1930s to 1950s, and the intention to utilize modern carburettors like the twin-choke Weber DCOEs in new manifold builds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ford 4-cylinder engine models (T-, A-, and B- engines)
  • Knowledge of dual-carburettor systems and their configurations
  • Familiarity with intake manifold design principles
  • Basic concepts of air-fuel mixture dynamics in engine performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and functionality of dual-carburettor intake manifolds
  • Learn about the impact of cross-over pipes on intake runner performance
  • Explore the specifications and tuning of twin-choke Weber DCOE carburettors
  • Investigate historical advancements in carburettor technology from the 1930s to 1950s
USEFUL FOR

Engine builders, automotive engineers, and enthusiasts interested in optimizing intake manifold designs for classic Ford engines, particularly those looking to enhance performance through dual-carburettor setups.

Bret Williamson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there, hope someone is able to help me. I am trying to find some info on early intake manifold designs, for Ford 4 cylinder engines, otherwise known as the T-, A- and B- engines. These engines came standard with two intake manifold inlets, and 4 exhaust manifold outlets cast into the block.
I have found lots of pictures of after-market dual-carburettor manifolds. These used dual intake runners, with two general systems. In the first system, the carburettors mounted on a common plenum, which then opened into the intake runners. In the second system, the carburettors were mounted at the top of the intake runner, with a cross-over pipe linking the intake runners.
Does anyone know the theory behind this cross-over pipe, or seeming balancing of the intake runners? Is one more effective than the other? Can anyone point me to a source that might explain the principles?
Cheers
Bret W.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sounds like it's just a balancing pipe, equalising pressure in the runners to ensure that the cylinders are inducing the same quantity, and mixture, of inlet charge.

Do you have any pictures of the arrangements?
 
Don't know the Ford engines, but I've dealt with separate plenum systems on other engines.
It was a real headache to syncronize the carbs.

Perhaps the crossover was intended to reduce the syncronization problem as brewnog suggests.
 
I've got a Ford engine (1960s design) using two twin-choke carbs, so there is a plenum for each pair of cylinders. As a result, cylinders 1 & 2, and cylinders 3 & 4 are balanced, but it can be quite a pain to balance the two pairs. The original carburettor on the engine had a single plenum, and single carb feeding all four cylinders on a common manifold. Much easier to set up, but not nearly the same flow.
 
I think you are on to something there brewnog. I seem to remember reading something similar about crossover pipes in exhaust systems blancing the pressure.

I am planning to build a dual-carb manifold, but thought i would try to understand the principles before i added anything to the design unnecessarily! Like i said, a lot of the aftermarket stuff was twin-carb items, most developed in the 30's, 40's and 50's, when there wasn't a wide range of different flow-rate carbs to choose from, like we have today. So, those clever guys realising that the more air/fuel mix available, the more potential energy, started adding multiple carbs.
So, my aim is to emulate that basic idea, but using more modern (60's) carburettors.
 
Mmm, twin choke Weber DCOEs maybe?

:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
60K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K