Understanding L'Hopitals Problem Approximation

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparkle123
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the approximation related to L'Hôpital's rule and its application in evaluating limits, particularly in the context of sequences involving the variable r and its relationship to the parameters i and N.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of using L'Hôpital's rule for the limit in question, with some questioning the conditions under which the approximation holds true. There is also a discussion about the implications of the value of r and its effect on the limit.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the problem, with some participants providing insights into the conditions necessary for the limit to exist. There is an ongoing exploration of whether L'Hôpital's rule is applicable, with differing opinions on its necessity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the approximation may fail under certain conditions, specifically when |r| < 1, and discuss the historical context of the terminology used, including the spelling of L'Hôpital's name.

sparkle123
Messages
172
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How did this approximation come about? It doesn't seem like it's by L'Hopital's rule. Thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-05-28 at 10.44.16 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-05-28 at 10.44.16 AM.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 527
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, it is L'Hopital's rule. Note that the limit might only exist if i and N have the same sign, or i is negative and N is positive (so as to guarantee we actually have an indeterminate form). We then have three cases; i&lt;N, i=N, i&gt;N.

Assuming the above limit exists (that is we're in the situation I mentioned above) applying l'Hopital's rule gives you\lim_{k\rightarrow ∞}\frac{1-r^{ki}}{1-r^{kN}}=\lim_{k\rightarrow ∞}\frac{-ir^{ki}}{-Nr^{kN}}=\lim_{k\rightarrow∞}\frac{i}{N}r^{k(i-N)}.
What happens with the various cases? Compare to the value of the limit \lim_{k\rightarrow ∞}\frac{r^{ki}}{r^{kN}}.
 
sparkle123 said:

Homework Statement



How did this approximation come about? It doesn't seem like it's by L'Hopital's rule. Thanks!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The result is false if |r| < 1 because in that case the LHS is 1 but the RHS could be 0, infinity or 1, depending on the values of i and N. For |r| > 1 it follows easily and has nothing at all to do with l'Hospital (that is not l'Hopital---you need an 's' in it).
 
Ray Vickson said:
The result is false if |r| < 1 because in that case the LHS is 1 but the RHS could be 0, infinity or 1, depending on the values of i and N. For |r| > 1 it follows easily and has nothing at all to do with l'Hospital (that is not l'Hopital---you need an 's' in it).

True, true; forgot about |r|. Although Ray, I'm a bit confused as to why you say that this has nothing to do with L'Hopital's rule.
 
Last edited:
christoff said:
True, true; forgot about |r|. Although Ray, I'm a bit confused as to why you say that this has nothing to do with L'Hopital's rule.

l'HoSpital's rule is not needed, because all we need is to note that r^m - 1 = r^m * [1 - (1/r^m)] and 1/r^m --> 1 as m --> inf.
 
Ray Vickson said:
l'HoSpital's rule is not needed, because all we need is to note that r^m - 1 = r^m * [1 - (1/r^m)] and 1/r^m --> 1 as m --> inf.

Ah, true. Thanks for the clarification. And I really don't like including the s in L'Hôpital; personally I think dropping the accent and adding an s just makes the pronunciation even more confusing to newcomers. Don't want people to think he was a medical doctor or something :-p
 
christoff said:
Ah, true. Thanks for the clarification. And I really don't like including the s in L'Hôpital; personally I think dropping the accent and adding an s just makes the pronunciation even more confusing to newcomers. Don't want people to think he was a medical doctor or something :-p

Well his name was ... with an 's', but pronounced with no 's'. I do not feel personally empowered to alter the spelling for the sake of convenience, but that's just me.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Well his name was ... with an 's', but pronounced with no 's'. I do not feel personally empowered to alter the spelling for the sake of convenience, but that's just me.

Having just looked up the history of his name, I now agree with you. I was under the impression that the English spelling L'Hospital came from the direction translation of Hôpital. Apparently he was named L'Hospital originally, with the silent s, but then the French changed their orthography in the mid 18th century and the "os" became a ô. History defeats me again.
 
Thank you to both! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K