MHB Understanding Limit Notation & Symbols: L & <=>

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terminology
AI Thread Summary
In limit notation, L represents the value of the limit as x approaches c, denoted as lim_{x→c} f(x) = L. The symbol <=>, or iff, indicates a biconditional relationship, meaning both sides of the equation are equivalent. Specifically, the statement lim_{x→c} f(x) = L iff lim_{x→c^+} f(x) = L and lim_{x→c^-} f(x) = L asserts that the overall limit exists if and only if both the right-hand and left-hand limits equal L. The variables f, c, and L are typically universally quantified, indicating that the statement applies to all functions f and real numbers c and L. Understanding this notation is crucial for analyzing the behavior of functions at specific points.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My professor wrote something on the board the other day and I forgot to ask after class.

$$\lim_{{x}\to{c}} f(x)$$ = L <=>$$\lim_{{x}\to{c^+}} f(x)$$ = L && $$\lim_{{x}\to{c^-}} f(x)$$ = L

What does mean by L and what does <=> mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The $\LaTeX$ notation for <=> is $\iff$, the iff operation. $A \iff B$ means "if A then B and if B then A".

$L$ is simply the limit, the value of $\lim_{x \to c} f(x)$.
 
$L$ is a variable that ranges over real numbers. The statement
\[
\lim_{{x}\to{c}} f(x)=L\iff \left(\lim_{{x}\to{c}^+} f(x)=L\text{ and }\lim_{{x}\to{c}^-} f(x)=L\right)
\]
whatever it means, has three variables: $f$, $c$ and $L$. Here $f$ ranges over functions from $\Bbb R$ to $\Bbb R$, while $c$ and $L$ range over $R$. If a statement has variables like this, it usually means that they are universally quantified, i.e., the claim is that the statement holds for all $f$, $c$ and $L$.

This particular statement says that the limit of $f$ is $L$ iff both the right-sided and the left-sided limits of $f$ are $L$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top