MHB Understanding Lusin's Theorem for $\mathbb{R}$ and Its Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter joypav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Problem:
Let $f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be measurable. Then there exists a sequence of continuous functions $(g_n)$ such that $limg_n(x)$ exists for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ and $limg_n(x) = f(x)$ a.e. x.

Is this like Lusin's Theorem? Lusin's theorem for the real numbers? If so, how does this change the proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my proof (posting for completeness but if you have corrections feel free to comment!).

Proof:
Apply the Approximation Theorem to $f$.
Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of simple functions such that $f_n \rightarrow f$ point wise.
For every $n \in \Bbb{N}$, let
$F_n \subset E$ be closed such that $m(R - F_n) < \frac{\epsilon}{2^k}$ such that $f_n |_{F_n}$ is continuous.
(By Egorov's) $\implies \exists B \subset R$ such that $m(B) < \epsilon$ and $f_n \rightarrow f$ uniformly on $R - B$.
WLOG, assume $B$ is open.
Then $R - B$ is closed.
Let $F_0 = R - B$.

Claim: $f |_{F_\infty}$ is continuous.
A uniformly convergent sequence of continuous functions is continuous
$\implies f |_{F_\infty} = F_0 \cap \cap_{k}F_k$ is continuous.
Then,
$m(E - F_\infty) \leq \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}m(E - F_n) < 2\epsilon$
$\implies$ We've found $F \subset R$ closed such that $m(R - F) < \epsilon$ and $f |_F$ is continuous.

Now, consider our set F.
$\exists G_1, G_2,...$ open and pairwise disjoint such that $F^c = \cup_{i \in \Bbb{N}}G_i$.

Let $G_i = (a_i, b_i)$. Let,
$g(x) = $
$f(x), x \in F$
$(\frac{b_i - x}{b_i - a_i})f(a_i) + (\frac{x - a_i}{b_i - a_i})f(b_i), x \in (a_i, b_i)$

Then,
$f |_F$ continuous $\implies g |_F$ is continuous.
We extend $g$ so that it is also continuous on $F^c$ by the definition for $g$ given.
We conclude that,
$g : R \rightarrow R$ is continuous and $g |_F = f$.
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top