Understanding Matter: Quark Transfer and Neutrino Differences

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sasa
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of quark transfer, the formation of antiparticles, and the differences between neutrinos and antineutrinos. Participants explore theoretical aspects related to particle interactions, decay processes, and the nature of particles within the context of nuclear physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that quark transfer may be responsible for the formation of antiparticles and the conversion of protons to neutrons within the nucleus.
  • There is a question regarding the distinction between neutrinos and antineutrinos, with some suggesting that their differences may only be relevant for balancing equations.
  • It is noted that photons are theorized to be their own antiparticles.
  • One participant asks for clarification on the term "transfer of quarks" and whether it relates to processes like positron emission in beta decay.
  • Another participant questions the presence of quarks in leptons, indicating a need for further explanation.
  • Some participants mention that the interaction of quarks is believed to be the cause of the strong nuclear force, while expressing uncertainty about the term "transfer of quarks."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of quark interactions and the nature of neutrinos. There is no consensus on the meaning of "transfer of quarks" or the specifics of how neutrinos and antineutrinos differ, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unclear definitions of terms like "transfer of quarks" and the lack of resolution regarding the interaction differences between neutrinos and antineutrinos. The discussion also references external resources for further clarification without resolving the underlying questions.

Sasa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
when we are dealing with matter could it not be postulated that
it is indeed the transfer of quarks that are causing the formation
of antiparticles (and the conversion of protons to neutrons) within the nucleus?
When dealing with neutrinos and anti neutrionos what, apart from the
need to balance the formula really separates the two?
it is not theorized that photons are their own antiparticles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sasa said:
when we are dealing with matter could it not be postulated that
it is indeed the transfer of quarks that are causing the formation
of antiparticles (and the conversion of protons to neutrons) within the nucleus?
:confused:
The formation of anti-particles within the nucleus? Could you explain what you mean by this? Do you mean the positron emmision from the [itex]\beta^+[/itex] decay?
[itex]\beta^+[/itex] decay in the nucleus (the process which accounts for the conversion of protons to neutrons in the nucleus- which cannot happen in free space) is mediated by the weak force.

When dealing with neutrinos and anti neutrionos what, apart from the
need to balance the formula really separates the two?
it is not theorized that photons are their own antiparticles?

The particle that is seen after a neutron decays to a proton that accompanies the electron is simply named the electron anti-neutrino and the particle the emission of a positron (often called [itex]\beta^+[/itex] in nuclear physics) from a nucleus is called a electron neutrino. I don't really know if there is truly a way to tell them apart other than that. That is to say, do they interact differently (you could probably use them in some sort of scattering experiment and see how they interact).

And yes the photon is its own anti-particle.

I think you may simply be caught up in the use of the prefix "anti". The anti-particle has the same mass as its non-anti partner, it just has the opposite charge for all quanutm numbers they carry. Since the world is awash in electrons, we consider them the matter and we call the positron the anti-matter. But we could have easily decided that the electron was the antipositron. No problem there.
 
Sasa said:
when we are dealing with matter could it not be postulated that
it is indeed the transfer of quarks that are causing the formation
of antiparticles (and the conversion of protons to neutrons) within the nucleus?
When dealing with neutrinos and anti neutrionos what, apart from the
need to balance the formula really separates the two?
it is not theorized that photons are their own antiparticles?

Where are these "quarks" in leptons?

Zz.
 
What is meant by "transfer of quarks"?

It is believed/theorized that a quark is "transformed" in positron (e+[/sub]) emission, or beta decay.

For beta decay in which a neutron transforms to a proton, electron and anti-neutrino, see http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/particles/proton.html#c3

See also - Transformation of Quark Flavors by the Weak Interaction
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/particles/qrkdec.html#c1

Feynman Diagrams for Weak Force
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/forces/funfor.html#c4
 
Sasa, if your thread is deleted, it is unwise to create the same thread under another username.

To repeat myself from last night, I think it is the interaction of quarks that is the cause of the strong nuclear force, I do not know what you mean by "transfer of quarks", either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K