Understanding Multiple Delta Function in 1D and Multidimensional Spaces

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the multiple delta function in one-dimensional and multidimensional contexts. It begins with the one-dimensional delta function and its representation involving simple zeros of a function. The conversation then shifts to the multidimensional case, where the delta function is expressed as a sum over the zeros of a function treated with one variable while considering the other as a parameter. The participants confirm that this approach is valid, using the example of the delta function on the light cone. The exchange concludes with expressions of gratitude and encouragement.
fuwuchen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have trouble understanding the multiple delta function. For one dimensional delta function, we have
δ(\varphi(x))=\sum_{i=1}^{N}δ(x−xi)|\varphi′(xi)|
where xi's (for i = 1 to N) are simple zeros of f(x) and it is known that f(x) has no zeros of multiplicitiy > 1

but what is the case of multiple delta function
δ(f(x,y))=?

PS:This my first time to this forum, I'm not familiar with Latex. Sorry for the caused inconvenience.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well one thing you could do is to treat y as a parameter and f(x,y) as a function of one variable. Then the zeroes of f(x,y) occur at x = ξi(y), and you have δ(f(x,y)) = ∑ δ(x - ξi(y)) |[∂f(x,y)/∂x]x = ξi(y)|.
 
Bill_K said:
Well one thing you could do is to treat y as a parameter and f(x,y) as a function of one variable. Then the zeroes of f(x,y) occur at x = ξi(y), and you have δ(f(x,y)) = ∑ δ(x - ξi(y)) |[∂f(x,y)/∂x]x = ξi(y)|.


Thank a lot for your help, Bill!

But I wonder whether we can treat y as a parameter and have x = ξi(y), as in f(x,y) the two arguments x and y are independent to each other.
 
Sure, that's perfectly legal. You will often see this approach used when dealing with the delta function on the light cone δ(x2 - c2t2). Instead of calling it a function of two variables f(x, t) = x2 - c2t2, we define a parameter a = ct and work with a function of one variable, δ(x2 - a2). By the one-dimensional rule this is equal to |1/2a| (δ(x - a) + δ(x + a)), which can then be written |1/2ct| (δ(x - ct) + δ(x + ct)).
 
Bill_K said:
Sure, that's perfectly legal. You will often see this approach used when dealing with the delta function on the light cone δ(x2 - c2t2). Instead of calling it a function of two variables f(x, t) = x2 - c2t2, we define a parameter a = ct and work with a function of one variable, δ(x2 - a2). By the one-dimensional rule this is equal to |1/2a| (δ(x - a) + δ(x + a)), which can then be written |1/2ct| (δ(x - ct) + δ(x + ct)).

Yes, you are right!
Thanks again for your help, good luck with you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K