Understanding Negative Velocity and Displacement on a Velocity-Time Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter grzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement
AI Thread Summary
The area under a velocity-time graph represents displacement, while the total area accounts for distance, with negative areas indicating motion in the opposite direction. The integral of the graph assigns a negative value to areas below the x-axis, reflecting negative velocity and displacement. Understanding these concepts requires familiarity with integration, but it is possible to explain negative areas without it. Students often question why areas can be negative, which can be clarified by emphasizing that negative velocity corresponds to negative displacement. Thus, the distinction between distance and displacement is crucial in interpreting velocity-time graphs.
grzz
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
Is area under a velocity-time graph a distance or displacement?
Relevant Equations
Velocity = rate of change of displacement with time.
I think the area required is a displacement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends if you mean area or signed area (integral)
 
Thanks
 
grzz said:
Homework Statement:: Is area under a velocity-time graph a distance or displacement?
Relevant Equations:: Velocity = rate of change of displacement with time.

I think the area required is a displacement.
The area under a curve is always, by definition, a positive number. If a curve crosses the ##x## axis, then the total area between the curve and ##x## axis is the sum of all the separate areas.

The integral, however, assigns a negative sign to areas below the ##x## axis. The integral may be positive or negative or zero.

In terms of physics, the integral of a velocity time graph gives the displacement. Whereas, the total area under a velocity time graph gives the total distance.
 
Hence such a question makes sense only to students who are familiar with integration. Am I correct to say this?
 
grzz said:
Hence such a question makes sense only to students who are familiar with integration. Am I correct to say this?
Not necessarily. You can take an area below the ##x## axis to be negative, without relying on integration.
 
A student who knows about integration will not ask why the area can be negative while one who does not know about integration will ask why the area below the x axis is negative. What answer can I give him then?
 
grzz said:
A student who knows about integration will not ask why the area can be negative while one who does not know about integration will ask why the area below the x axis is negative. What answer can I give him then?
If we are talking about a velocity-time graph, then velocity is negative below the time axis. And displacement is negative. That is nothing to do with integration.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top