Understanding Nonlinear Analysis in ANSYS: A Tutorial for Scientists

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on performing nonlinear analysis in ANSYS using the NLGEOM option. The provided APDL script demonstrates the setup for a cantilever beam analysis, highlighting the differences in maximum displacement results when NLGEOM is enabled versus disabled. With NLGEOM on, the maximum displacement is 1.019, while it is 1.024 when NLGEOM is off, indicating that the inclusion of nonlinear geometry analysis results in a more rigid structure and reduced displacement. The key takeaway is that enabling NLGEOM allows for a more accurate representation of the structural behavior under load.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ANSYS APDL scripting
  • Familiarity with nonlinear analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of beam theory and mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in using ANSYS software
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced features of ANSYS NLGEOM for complex structures
  • Learn about the impact of mesh size on nonlinear analysis results in ANSYS
  • Investigate the differences between static and dynamic analysis in ANSYS
  • Study the effects of material properties on nonlinear behavior in ANSYS simulations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and students involved in structural analysis, particularly those using ANSYS for nonlinear simulations and seeking to understand the implications of geometric nonlinearity on structural performance.

timewilltell
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi,

I have some confusion for performing nonlinear analysis in ANSYS with NLGEOM... I was following the tutorial, the APDL is given below

/prep7 ! start preprocessor
/title,NonLinear Analysis of Cantilever Beam
k,1,0,0,0 ! define keypoints
k,2,5,0,0 ! 5" beam (length)
l,1,2 ! define line
et,1,beam3 ! Beam
r,1,0.03125,4.069e-5,0.125 ! area, izz, height of beam
mp,ex,1,30.0e6 ! Young's Modulus
mp,prxy,1,0.3 ! Poisson's ratio
esize,0.1 ! element size of 0.1"
lmesh,all ! mesh the line
finish ! stop preprocessor
/solu ! start solution phase
antype,static ! static analysis
nlgeom,on ! turn on non-linear geometry analysis
autots,on ! auto time stepping
nsubst,5,1000,1 ! Size of first substep=1/5 of the total load, max # substeps=1000, min # substeps=1
outres,all,all ! save results of all iterations
dk,1,all ! constrain all DOF on ground
fk,2,mz,-100 ! applied moment
solve
/post1
pldisp,1 ! display deformed mesh
PRNSOL,U,X ! lists horizontal deflections

the maximum displacement is 1.019

now without NLGEOM option that is just omitting these lines from above apdl prog

nlgeom,on ! turn on non-linear geometry analysis
autots,on ! auto time stepping
nsubst,5,1000,1 ! Size of first substep=1/5 of the total load, max # substeps=1000, min # substeps=1
outres,all,all ! save results of all iterations

maximum displacement is 1.024 , which should be less then the previous analysis with NLGEOM on

I don't understand this... kindly guide me where I am wrong
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello,

"Nlgeom,on" takes into account nonlinearities in your analysis, i.e. the stiffness matrix is re-evaluated for each substep. The structure is more rigid (come back to school), consequently the displacement is reduced compared with the case "Nlgeom,off".

Rgds.
 
hi ; my name is hossam
i want to any thing about luders hands
i have an exam tomorrow
anybody respond to me quiqly
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
Replies
1
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
2K