Undergrad Understanding Operators in Matrix Mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how operators in Matrix Mechanics affect wavefunctions, particularly through the application of a linear operator on a generic wavefunction expanded in terms of eigenfunctions. The notes recap the expansion theorem, emphasizing that applying an operator to a wavefunction involves acting on each eigenfunction used in the initial expansion. A key point of confusion arises regarding the representation of the operator's effect on eigenfunctions and whether these eigenfunctions are also eigenfunctions of the operator in question. The participant seeks clarification on how the operator's effect is encapsulated in the coefficients and the overall equation presented. The conversation highlights the complexity of visualizing operator effects in this mathematical framework.
Avardia
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand some notes that I have been given on Matrix Mechanics, specifically how the matrix element comes about and builds a matrix which when used applies the effect of an operator on a wavefunction. But I'm having some difficulties following what's being done in the notes with confidence. I've seen others do this another way which I can follow well enough but I really want to see how this one works.

As far as I understand the notes start off recapping expansion theorem and say if we work with a single complete set of eigenfunctions to build any old wavefunction then what we get is a unique list of coefficients for each wavefunction we are expanding. We then see an operator acting on a generic wavefunction and since we work with linear operators its equivalent to applying the operator to each of the eigenfunctions that we use to expand the generic wavefunction. Seen in the equation above equation (2.1).

Then comes my problem, just above equation (2.1) we are told
In general the effect of an operator on any eigenfunction will produce a wavefunction which can be represented as a sum of the original eigenfunctions, i.e.

From my understanding the quote says to further expand the result of the operator acting on each of the eigenfunctions we used to expand the generic wavefunction. Also basing that off the use of the subscript i on the LHS of (2.1) and the general flow of where the notes seems to be taking me. Part of my issue is how that is represented in (2.1). What I think (shakily) is happening is that we have applied the operator to the eigenfunction, don't exactly know if the eigenfunction is a eigenfunction of that generic operator, and it will produce a wavefuction which can be expanded using the same eigenfunctions that we used in the first expansion of the generic wavefunction. And here the Oji I believe is the coefficient of the each of the eigenfunctions?

Then putting it all together in the equation below (2.1) is what makes me question what I'm working with here. The operator O is working on a generic wavefunction, that's equal to O working on each eigenfunction that we break the wavefunction into then we get the RHS of (2.1) except we are we are expanding every eigenfunction and we also have the aj coefficient from the original expansion. This is somehow supposed to show me that Oji contains the effect of the operator. I can't seem to see how this works. Will be grateful for any help you can give!

MM1.JPG

MM2.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think ##\bar O## is just an arbitrary operator that looks like this: ##\bar O = \sum_{jm} | \psi_j \rangle O_{jm} \langle \psi_m |##. Try substituting that into each of the equations in your text and see if they make sense.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
689
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K