Understanding Partial Differentiation with Polar Coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating partial derivatives of a function z = f(x,y) in polar coordinates, where x and y are expressed in terms of r and θ. The participants confirm that the derivatives ∂z/∂r and ∂z/∂θ have been correctly derived, emphasizing that they depend on dz/dx and dz/dy. For the mixed partial derivative ∂²z/∂r∂θ, it is noted that one should differentiate the result of one partial derivative with respect to the other variable. The conversation concludes with the observation that the mixed partial derivatives are equal, indicating that the function z is well-behaved, as evidenced by the symmetry of the second rank Hessian. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering partial differentiation in polar coordinates.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
If z = f(x,y), where x = rcos(\theta) and y = rsin(\theta), find \frac{\partial z}{\partial r}, \frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta}, and \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial r\partial\theta}

Here's what I've done:
(a)
\frac{\partial z}{\partial r} = \frac{dz}{dx} \frac{\partial x}{\partial r} + \frac{dz}{dy} \frac{\partial y}{\partial r} = \frac{dz}{dx} \cos{\theta} + \frac{dz}{dy} \sin{\theta}
(b)
\frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta} = \frac{dz}{dx} \frac{\partial x}{\partial\theta} + \frac{dz}{dy} \frac{\partial y}{\partial\theta} = -\frac{dz}{dx} r\sin{\theta} + \frac{dz}{dy} r\cos{\theta}

My question is, for parts a and b, is this correct or must something also be done with the dz/dx and dz/dy, and for part c, I don't know how to do it. Can someone help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you don't have to put the dz/dx and dz/dy. its just cos + sin.
for c, you just take the derivative with respect to r and theta. i forget which you are supposed to do first. but you just do one, than take the derivative of the new form with respect to the other variable.
 
Points a) and b) are solved wonderfully.
Point c) is a bit tricky,meaning that u'll have to differentiate one of the 2 expressions found at a) & b) wrt the other variable.
\frac{\partial^{2}z}{\partial r \partial \theta}=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta})

Try to do it this way and tell where you get stuck.

Daniel.
 
One more thing.It's still a partial derivative for "z" (or "f") too,becasue it depends explicitely on 2 variables,namely "x" and "y"...

Daniel.
 
Thank you dexter. I checked both
\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta})
and
\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}(\frac{\partial z}{\partial r})

and they both come to the same answer. So it must be right. :biggrin:
 
It meant that the function "z" is "well behaved".There are functions for which the mixed partial derivatives are different one from another.In a more advanced way,the 2-nd rank hessian is not symmetric...

Daniel.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
855
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
749
Replies
4
Views
2K