Understanding Perturbation Theory and Spin in Quantum Mechanics

1Kris
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
In my quest to learn quantum mechanics I've become a little confused and I have a question.
It is "In The Feynman Lectures on Physics Volume 3, is most of the work, eg. ammonia molecule done using perturbation theory or is this method something else, not perturbation theory?"
I started to learn a little about perturbation theory elsewhere, and it seemed similar but not quite the same, so I'm a little foggy about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1Kris said:
In my quest to learn quantum mechanics I've become a little confused and I have a question.
It is "In The Feynman Lectures on Physics Volume 3, is most of the work, eg. ammonia molecule done using perturbation theory or is this method something else, not perturbation theory?"
I started to learn a little about perturbation theory elsewhere, and it seemed similar but not quite the same, so I'm a little foggy about this.

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what it is that you're asking?
 
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3, Feynman uses a an approximation of treating systems as two state systems. Is this the same as perturbation theory, or is it a different method?
 
1Kris said:
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3, Feynman uses a an approximation of treating systems as two state systems. Is this the same as perturbation theory, or is it a different method?

I think the best answer, infuriating as it may be, is "yes".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perturbation_theory

You can see there are elements of it there, but it's not a pure treatment for the reasons you mention, I think.
 
Haha thanks for that, why infuriating?
 
1Kris said:
Haha thanks for that, why infuriating?

Generally people finding that the answer is "yes" to a yes or no question is infuriating. I'm glad you don't! :)
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top