Understanding Polarities in Inductors and Capacitors in KVL

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_kool_guy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kvl
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the polarities of inductors and capacitors in the context of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) within a series RLC circuit. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the assumptions made about the charging and discharging states of the components and how these affect the resulting equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of assumed current directions on voltage responses in inductors and capacitors. Questions arise about how to determine di/dt and the corresponding polarities based on initial conditions and component behavior.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the relationship between current direction and voltage polarity, while others seek clarification on specific scenarios involving initial conditions and component responses. There is an ongoing exploration of how to derive differential equations based on these assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of initial conditions, such as whether the capacitor is charged or if current is already flowing, which influence the analysis of the circuit. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations regarding the behavior of the circuit components under different assumptions.

the_kool_guy
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
i generally get confused in polarities of inductors and capacitors while doing KVL.
eg about a series RLC circuit ,the equation turns out to be ( Ldi/dt + iR + Vc = 0 )
this is the equation about assumed 'i' if we assume both capacitor and inductor in charging mode...
...
what if I assume inductor is discharging...then how can i reach the above equation...?

similar problem happens to me with circuits having only 1 active component...
.
.
.
can anyone enlighten me on this ..?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Writing KVL around a loop is all about recording the voltage "responses" of the components to the loop current. You take an assumed direction for the loop current and follow that direction around the loop. If you are given specifics about a given component being in the process of charging or discharging, then that only serves to determine the direction that you should assume for the current.

Resistors respond to the instantaneous value of the current with a voltage drop I*R. Inductors respond to the rate of change of the current and produce a drop of L*dI/dt. Note that the assumed direction of the current also specifies the direction (sign) of dI/dt --- positive is an increase in current in the direction of the assumed current.
 
how does assumed direction of current specifies di/dt...?
 
the_kool_guy said:
how does assumed direction of current specifies di/dt...?
An increase in current, di, is an increase in the same direction as the assumed current flow. A decrease is a change in the opposite direction. It's these increases or decreases which provoke the component's response in terms of voltage change, and thus the polarity of those changes.
 
i m not able to get...
in LCR circuit after having assuming direction of current say clockwise;
what will be the assumed polarities of inductor and capacitor knowing say initial capacitor voltage Vo
 
with initial capacitor voltage and direction of assumed current i can get sign of dq/dt
(depending upon current entering or exiting from positive plate ) but what about di/dt for inductor...?
 
The definition of the characteristics of the inductor give the answer:

attachment.php?attachmentid=38608&stc=1&d=1315320909.gif


An increase in the current i causes a voltage to appear across the inductor as shown. If di/dt were negative instead, then the resulting voltage polarity would be reversed, too.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    496 bytes · Views: 743
in the attached figure.., let i be in clockwise.
so how can i get di/dt ..
again when battery is removed how can i get di/dt..
cause it is what di/dt that will determine polarity of inductor
 

Attachments

  • RLC_series_circuit.png
    RLC_series_circuit.png
    578 bytes · Views: 531
in this figure with assumed polarities and current how can i get the corresponding differential equation...?
 

Attachments

  • RLC_series_circuit.png
    RLC_series_circuit.png
    500 bytes · Views: 542
  • #10
When you're working from given initial conditions then you need to know something about the properties of the components.

Suppose that you being with the battery disconnected, no charge on the capacitor, and (obviously) no current at all flowing in the circuit. When the battery is first applied, the inductor resists change in current -- no current flows at the very first instant. But the current will be changing, increasing in the 'forward' direction, being driven by the polarity of the battery. This di/dt will cause a voltage to appear across the inductor according to v = L*di/dt. Initially this voltage will be equal in magnitude to the supply voltage.

The capacitor, being initially uncharged, will have zero volts across it at the first instant. As the current begins to flow, it will gradually build up a voltage. Eventually the capacitor will be fully charged with a voltage equal to the supply voltage. No further current will flow. With no current, the voltage across the resistor will be zero. With no change in current (di/dt) the voltage across the inductor will be zero.

When the battery is removed there will be no closed circuit -- no closed path for current to flow. So the capacitor will just sit there, fully charged.
 
  • #11
the_kool_guy said:
in this figure with assumed polarities and current how can i get the corresponding differential equation...?

You need to state the initial conditions. Is there a current already flowing? Is the capacitor charged? If so, what is the polarity of the voltage on the capacitor?

The initial conditions will determine the 'directions' in which things happen.
 
  • #12
ok i will try on a few questions , if doubt persists i will ask..
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
152
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K