Understanding Polarization: Solving a Problem with the Law of Malus

  • Thread starter Thread starter muirontriton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving polarized light passing through two polarizers with a specified angle between their axes. The original poster attempts to apply the Law of Malus to determine the fraction of incident intensity that emerges from the polarizers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Law of Malus, questioning the correctness of the original poster's calculations and assumptions about the angles involved. There is also a focus on the implications of the incoming light being polarized and how that affects the outcome.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions made about the angles and the nature of the incoming light. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the problem statement, particularly concerning the polarization of the incoming light and the angles of the polarizers. The original poster's calculations and the expected answer of 1/2 are also under scrutiny.

muirontriton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was wondering if any of you guys can tell me whether or not I did the following polarization problem correct.

Problem:
Polarized light passes through a sequence of two polarizers whose axis of polarization forms a 30 degree angle. The second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer. What fraction if the incident intensity emerges from the set of polarizers?

The answer is 1/2.

My attempt:
I used the Law of Malus:
S = S(i)*cos^2(θ)

So I did this:

cos^3(30) * cos^2(30) * S(i) = S

The cos^3(30) comes from the average of the first two polarizers. As for the second part, I am not sure. I assumed that the problem says the angle is still 30° after the light goes through the first two. In the end, I get .49, which is close to the answer. However, I feel strongly that what I did is completely wrong. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That cos^3 is what is messing you up.

You know that the first polarizer brings it down to a fraction of .75.

Now how can you bring it down another 2/3?

I honestly don't know myself - there are no even angles that when put into cos^2 equal 2/3. I could be horribly wrong, but are you sure the answer is 1/2?
 
Last edited:
The answer is still 1/2.

What does it mean by "the second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer?"
 
http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap24/polarizers/Polarizer.htm

Look at this applet. Change it to the two polarizer setting. Rotate the first polarizer 30 degrees (so 60 or 120 degrees, doesn't matter which). As far as I can tell, this is the situation described. That's why I'm confused. It's not 1/2. Maybe I'm wrong.

To answer your question, I'm pretty confident that that means it is at the same angle as the incoming light.
 
But this is with a beam of unpolarized light entering the polarizers. The light entering the polarizers is polarized. I used the applet and set the two polarizers to 30 degrees, and I got an intensity of 50%. That would make sense, but the light coming in is polarized, so wouldn't that lead a different approach?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K