B Understanding randomness in universe

Click For Summary
In a one-particle universe, the concept of randomness is limited as the evolution of the particle is governed by its Hamiltonian without any meaningful measurement. Introducing additional particles complicates the scenario, as their interactions lead to more complex dynamics. However, without a macroscopic measuring device, the notion of measurement remains ambiguous, suggesting that randomness may not truly exist. This discussion highlights a variation of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Understanding these principles is essential for exploring the nature of randomness in the universe.
shivakumar
Messages
12
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
finding randomness in single particle universe and understand randomness in nature
how will randomness of particle be in one particle universe? how will it evolve with two, three or four particle based universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shivakumar said:
TL;DR Summary: finding randomness in single particle universe and understand randomness in nature

how will randomness of particle be in one particle universe? how will it evolve with two, three or four particle based universe?
As far as QM is concerned, a universe with a small number of particles will evolve under the Hamiltonian associated with their mutual interaction. Without a macroscopic measuring device, the question of a measurement of the particles is meaningless. In that sense there is no randomness.

That is one variation of the so-called measurement problem.
 

Thread 'Using energy principles to find equilibrium depth of floating object'

For fun I was trying to use energy considerations to determine the depth to which a solid object will sink in a fluid to reach equilibrium. The first approach that I tried was just to consider the change in potential energy of the block and the fluid as the block is lowered some unknown distance d into the fluid similar to what is shown in the answer to this post. Upon taking the limit as the vessel's cross sectional area approaches infinity I have an extra factor of 2 in the equilibrium...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Proper Understanding of Dynamical Systems and State Space
Replies
5
Views
969
Understanding Random Particle Motion in a Monoatomic Gas
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Is there a way in Lagrangian mechanics to incorporate the inertial response from initial momentum when using initial conditions instead of BCs?
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Understanding Randomness in Brownian Matter
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Conservation of Momentum for system of particles
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
I Newton's Third Law: Action & Reaction Along the Line Connecting Two Objects
Replies
5
Views
1K
B How did the universe start and evolve into what it is today?
Replies
24
Views
3K
B Does the Schrödinger Equation Imply a Deterministic Universe?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Dark Energy: Are We All Missing The Obvious?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Equation for Brownian Motion Trajectory
Replies
4
Views
2K