Understanding Schur's First Lemma in Group Representations

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Schur's First Lemma states that if a matrix commutes with all matrices in an irreducible representation (irrep), then it is a scalar multiple of the identity. The discussion revolves around the transformation of an element under conjugation and its implications for the conjugacy class. It is clarified that if an element g belongs to the subgroup K_i, then its conjugate h, formed by conjugating with g_k, also belongs to K_i due to the properties of conjugation preserving conjugacy classes. The bijective nature of the conjugation mapping ensures that distinct elements in K_i remain distinct. The conclusion confirms that the sum over elements in K_i can be replaced with a sum over their conjugates, reinforcing the lemma's application.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
i) Show that the matrix ##B^{\nu}_i = \sum_{g\in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g)##, consisting of the sum of the matrices of an irreducible ##[n_{\nu}]## representation which correspond to the elements of the conjugacy class ##K_i##, is a multiple of the identity.
Relevant Equations
N/A
So long as ##B^{\nu}_i## commutes with all the matrices in the irrep then the result follows from Schur's first lemma. So consider some element ##g_k## and form\begin{align*}
D^{(\nu)}(g_k) B^{\nu}_i D^{(\nu)}(g_k)^{-1} &= \sum_{g \in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g_k) D^{(\nu)}(g) D^{(\nu)}(g_k)^{-1} \\
&= \sum_{g \in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g_k g g_k^{-1})
\end{align*}If ##g_k g g_k^{-1} \equiv h \in K_i## then the right hand side would be nothing but ##B^{\nu}_i## (note that if ##g_k g g_k^{-1} = h## and ##g_k g' g_k^{-1} = h##, then it would follow that ##g' = g##, i.e. conjugating with ##g_k## would map each ##g \in K_i## to a distinct element ##h \in K_i##). The bit I can't figure is why ##h## is guaranteed to be in ##K_i##. An equivalence ##g \sim h## implies that there's some group element conjugating the two, but that depends on ##g## and ##h## and surely can't be a single element ##g_k## for every term in the sum? Wonder what I'm overlooking.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your ##h_k##? It seems to me you have not defined it. Or did you mean ##g_k##?
If the latter then the result that you are missing is that conjugation preserves the conjugacy class. If ##g \in K_i## then ##h = g_k g g_k^{-1} \in K_i## by definition because it is a conjugate of ##g## so the conjugation by ##g_k## is by definition a map from ##K_i## to ##K_i##, you have already shown that it maps distinct elements to distinct elements and so must be a bijection (assuming ##K_i## is finite).
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
(Yes apologies, there were a couple of typos which I've hopefully fixed!)

Thanks, I see now. Of course ##h \in K_i## because ##g \in K_i## and ##h \sim g##, and since the map is a bijection (as shown) one can replace ##\sum_{g \in K_i} \rightarrow \sum_{h \in K_i}## in the final line.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
340
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
349
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K