Understanding Schur's First Lemma in Group Representations

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Schur's First Lemma states that if an operator ##B^{\nu}_i## commutes with all matrices in an irreducible representation (irrep) ##D^{(\nu)}##, then it is a scalar multiple of the identity operator. The discussion clarifies that conjugation by an element ##g_k## preserves the conjugacy class, ensuring that if ##g \in K_i##, then the conjugate ##h = g_k g g_k^{-1}## also belongs to ##K_i##. The bijective nature of this conjugation mapping confirms that the sum over elements in ##K_i## can be transformed accordingly, reinforcing the lemma's implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and representations
  • Familiarity with irreducible representations (irreps)
  • Knowledge of conjugacy classes in group theory
  • Basic linear algebra concepts related to matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Schur's Lemma in representation theory
  • Explore the concept of conjugacy classes in depth
  • Learn about bijective mappings in group theory
  • Investigate applications of irreducible representations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying group theory and representation theory, particularly those interested in the applications of Schur's First Lemma.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
i) Show that the matrix ##B^{\nu}_i = \sum_{g\in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g)##, consisting of the sum of the matrices of an irreducible ##[n_{\nu}]## representation which correspond to the elements of the conjugacy class ##K_i##, is a multiple of the identity.
Relevant Equations
N/A
So long as ##B^{\nu}_i## commutes with all the matrices in the irrep then the result follows from Schur's first lemma. So consider some element ##g_k## and form\begin{align*}
D^{(\nu)}(g_k) B^{\nu}_i D^{(\nu)}(g_k)^{-1} &= \sum_{g \in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g_k) D^{(\nu)}(g) D^{(\nu)}(g_k)^{-1} \\
&= \sum_{g \in K_i} D^{(\nu)}(g_k g g_k^{-1})
\end{align*}If ##g_k g g_k^{-1} \equiv h \in K_i## then the right hand side would be nothing but ##B^{\nu}_i## (note that if ##g_k g g_k^{-1} = h## and ##g_k g' g_k^{-1} = h##, then it would follow that ##g' = g##, i.e. conjugating with ##g_k## would map each ##g \in K_i## to a distinct element ##h \in K_i##). The bit I can't figure is why ##h## is guaranteed to be in ##K_i##. An equivalence ##g \sim h## implies that there's some group element conjugating the two, but that depends on ##g## and ##h## and surely can't be a single element ##g_k## for every term in the sum? Wonder what I'm overlooking.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your ##h_k##? It seems to me you have not defined it. Or did you mean ##g_k##?
If the latter then the result that you are missing is that conjugation preserves the conjugacy class. If ##g \in K_i## then ##h = g_k g g_k^{-1} \in K_i## by definition because it is a conjugate of ##g## so the conjugation by ##g_k## is by definition a map from ##K_i## to ##K_i##, you have already shown that it maps distinct elements to distinct elements and so must be a bijection (assuming ##K_i## is finite).
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
(Yes apologies, there were a couple of typos which I've hopefully fixed!)

Thanks, I see now. Of course ##h \in K_i## because ##g \in K_i## and ##h \sim g##, and since the map is a bijection (as shown) one can replace ##\sum_{g \in K_i} \rightarrow \sum_{h \in K_i}## in the final line.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
585
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
584
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K