Understanding Simple Harmonic Motion: Explaining x=Acos(wt+phi)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation of simple harmonic motion, specifically the expression x=Acos(wt+phi). Participants are trying to understand the significance of the phase constant phi, particularly in cases where phi equals zero, and how it relates to the initial conditions of the motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between the initial position of the system at t=0 and the value of phi. They question how different starting positions affect the phase constant and whether phi can be zero when the system starts from x=0.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarity on the implications of different values of phi. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between initial conditions and the phase constant, but there is no consensus on the correct interpretation yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the cosine function's periodicity and the constraints of the simple harmonic motion equation. There is a noted lack of explicit consensus on how to determine phi based on initial conditions.

Jozefina Gramatikova
Messages
62
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement



x=Acos(wt+phi)

Homework Equations


can somebody explain to me please when phi=0. I saw many different questions with many solutions and I can't understand when we have just x=Acos(wt) and when x=Acos(wt+phi)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jozefin Gramatikova said:

Homework Statement



x=Acos(wt+phi)

Homework Equations


can somebody explain to me please when phi=0. I saw many different questions with many solutions and I can't understand when we have just x=Acos(wt) and when x=Acos(wt+phi)

The Attempt at a Solution


It depends where the system starts at ##t=0##.
 
So, if it starts from x=0 at t=0 => phi=0? and at t=0 x=1 => phi would be different from zero?
 
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
So, if it starts from x=0 at t=0 phi=0? and at t=0 x=1 phi would be different from zero?

Yes. ##-A \le x(0) \le A##, where ##x(0)## is the displacement of the system at ##t=0##, and determines ##\phi##.
 
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
So, if it starts from x=0 at t=0 => phi=0? and at t=0 x=1 => phi would be different from zero?
Plug t=0 and ##\phi=0## into ##x(t) = A\cos(\omega t + \phi)##. Is ##x(0)## equal to 0?
 
vela said:
Plug t=0 and ##\phi=0## into ##x(t) = A\cos(\omega t + \phi)##. Is ##x(0)## equal to 0?
x(t)=Acos(0)
x(t)=A
 
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
x(t)=Acos(0)
x(t)=A
Presumably ##A \ne 0## otherwise there'd be no oscillating going on, so clearly ##x(0)=0## and ##\phi=0## contradict each other.
 
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
So, if it starts from x=0 at t=0 => phi=0?
No.
If it is at x0 at t=0 and at x=Acos(ωt+φ) at time t, what equation can you write for x0?
 
I don't know I am really confused right now.
 
  • #10
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
I don't know I am really confused right now.

##\cos(0) = 1##
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
##\cos(0) = 1##
I know that :D Thats why I said:
"x(t)=Acos(0)
x(t)=A"
 
  • #12
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
I don't know I am really confused right now.
Just substitute those t and x values in the general equation in post #8.
 
  • #13
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
x(t)=Acos(0)
When plugging in a value for t you should replace all occurrences of t.
 
  • #14
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
I know that :D Thats why I said:
"x(t)=Acos(0)
x(t)=A"
You did not seem to know it in post #3.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Just substitute those t and x values in the general equation in post #8.
x=Acos(ωt+φ)
x0=Acos(ω x 0+φ)
x0=Acos(ω x 0+φ)
x0=Acos(φ)?
 
  • #16
Could you give me the right solution, please? I get more and more confused with every single post.
 
  • #17
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
Could you give me the right solution, please? I get more and more confused with every single post.

Let's assume that ##A>0##, so when ##x(t) = A \cos( \omega t + \phi)##, the value of ##x(t)## oscillates back and forth between ##-A## and ##+A##. That is, ##-A \leq x(t) \leq A## for all ##t##. Furthermore, we have ##x = -A## for some ##t## and ##x = +A## for some other ##t##.

If ##\phi = 0## we have ##x(0) = A##, so that means that the motion starts at time zero from the upper end of the allowed interval. Then for a while ##x(t)## will decrease until it hits the lower end ##-A## of the allowed interval, at time ##\pi/\omega##. Then it will start to increase until it hits ##x=A## at time ##2 \pi/\omega,## etc., etc.

If you want ##x(0)## to be a point other than ##A## you need to have ##\phi \neq 0.## To help you to enhance your understanding, try the following question: "what would be the value of ##\phi## if you require ##x(0) = 0?## (Of course, because the ##\cos## function is periodic there will be many values of ##\phi## that will work, but among these there is one that is "simplest", and that is the one you should attempt to find.)
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Jozefin Gramatikova said:
x0=Acos(φ)?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K