Understanding Solutions to 2x=x2

  • Thread starter Thread starter christian0710
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation 2x = x², which yields two solutions: x = 2 and x = 0. The confusion arises from the division by the variable x, which is undefined when x = 0. The correct approach emphasizes that while both solutions are valid for the original equation, they do not apply to the equation x = 2, which only has x = 2 as its solution. The key takeaway is the importance of recognizing the implications of dividing by a variable that may equal zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with the concept of division by zero
  • Knowledge of integration limits in calculus
  • Ability to manipulate and factor quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of division by zero in algebraic equations
  • Learn about solving quadratic equations using factoring techniques
  • Explore the concept of solution sets in algebra
  • Research the role of limits in calculus, particularly in integration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra and calculus, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone seeking to clarify the nuances of solving equations involving variables.

christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
This may be a dumb question but if we have the equation 2x=x2 and we use algebra we get
2=x2/x ---> 2=x



How come the solution is x= 2 (obvious) AND x=0 (not so obvious for me)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly x=0 is a valid solution of the original equation. But the important lesson is that whenever you divide by an expression of unknown value (x in this case) you should bear in mind that division by zero is not a defined operation. The correct procedure is always to write "if (expression) is nonzero then ...".
 
I see so you obtain that if x=0 you get 2*0=^2 and that's why x=0 is an equation?
But if we started with the equation x=2, then i assume you can't say x=2 and x=0, is that correctly understood? I needed both solutions because i was finding the upper and lower limits for integration, but just confues about the fact that x=2 also has x=0 as solution.
 
christian0710 said:
I see so you obtain that if x=0 you get 2*0=^2 and that's why x=0 is an equation?
But if we started with the equation x=2, then i assume you can't say x=2 and x=0, is that correctly understood? I needed both solutions because i was finding the upper and lower limits for integration, but just confues about the fact that x=2 also has x=0 as solution.

Well doesn't 2x=x^2 ⇔0=x^2-2x ⇔ 0=x(x-2) ⇔x=0 or x=2 Is that clear now? It is pretty simple.
 
christian0710 said:
I see so you obtain that if x=0 you get 2*0=^2 and that's why x=0 is an equation?
If x = 0, you get 2*0 = 02, so x = 0 is a solution to the original equation.
christian0710 said:
But if we started with the equation x=2, then i assume you can't say x=2 and x=0, is that correctly understood?
The only possible replacement for x in the equation x = 2 is 2. That's the only value that makes the equation x = 2 a true statement.
christian0710 said:
I needed both solutions because i was finding the upper and lower limits for integration, but just confues about the fact that x=2 also has x=0 as solution.
The equation x = 2 does NOT have x = 0 as a solution. The equation 2x = x2 DOES have x = 0 (and x = 2) as a solution.

Since the equations x = 2 and 2x = x2 have different solution sets, they are not equivalent.
 
Thank you so much, now it's clear! Very clear :D
 
christian0710 said:
Thank you so much, now it's clear! Very clear :D

You're very welcome :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K